Re: Protocol specification of entailment level (was Re: The Entailment bit (was Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon))

On Sep 29, 2005, at 3:22 PM, Steve Harris wrote:
[snip]
> Sure but, my preferred design is to do this in the query language (the
> distinctions between what ended up in the query language and what in 
> the
> protocol seems somewhat arbitrary to me).
[snip]

Me too. But I've been terribly afraid to raise this point :)

Cheers,
Bijan.

Received on Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:26:28 UTC