- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 17:18:56 -0400
- To: Dave Beckett <Dave.Beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 10:11:18PM +0100, Dave Beckett wrote: > On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 15:02 -0400, Kendall Clark wrote: > > Dogs, > > > > How do I say, in a CONSTRUCT query, that if there's a triple T in the > > solution set, I don't want it in the output graph? I thought something like > > FILTER fn:not(T), but that doesn't work in the WHERE clause. But that > > doesn't seem to be legal. > > > > Do we have any functions that operate on triples? > > No, only functions on RDF Terms and XQuery terms. Yep, I figured that out right after asking the (dumb) question. However... > You can't do anything > with a graph-pattern-matched or constructed triple, such as bind it to a > variable so there's no way to use one in an expression. I don't remember this part of the design being discussed. Was it? Kendall Clark
Received on Friday, 5 August 2005 21:21:04 UTC