- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:55:28 +0100
- To: DAWG public list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I've like to propose some old tests that have been around for a while for approval. I guess noone will be willing to vote in telecol on 2005-09-27, but the week after maybe? In particular: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-testing-values-bound http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-testing-values-bound-2 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-testing-values-isuri http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-testing-values-isblank http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-testing-values-isliteral http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-testing-values-str http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-testing-values-lang http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-opt-query-001 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-opt-query-002 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-opt-query-003 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-opt-query-004 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-select-1 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-select-2 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-select-3 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#regex-query-001 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#regex-query-002 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#regex-query-003 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#regex-query-004 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#str-1 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#str-2 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#str-3 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#str-4 For the record I currently fail regex-query-001 because I dont do case sensitive regexs, and str-4 because I return a skolemised form when you call str() on bNodes, but I'm happy with the tests. Also, there are 4 tests that were approved with the old syntax, simple2/dawg-triple-pattern-00[1234] - they are mirrored by tests with the new syntax in simple/, but what should be done about them? Marked as negative tests, or just removed? I take it that the action of approving the replacements implicitly unapproved them, but maybe not. - Steve
Received on Monday, 26 September 2005 16:56:03 UTC