RE: plaintext agenda: RDF Data Access 27 Sep

-------- Original Message --------
> From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <>
> Date: 27 September 2005 07:10
> 
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:26:06AM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> > attached.
> > 
> ugh, very difficult to respond to html attachments.
> $(lynx -force_html -dump) gives:
> 
>     1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda
>           + [1]RDF Data Access WG teleconference 2005-09-27T14:30Z
>                o teleconference bridge: [2]+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
>           + supplementary IRC chat: [3]#dawg
>                o [4]log to appear
>           + scribe: volunteer please?
>           + PROPOSED: to accept [5]Minutes of RDF Data Access WG
>             2005-09-13 as a true record
>           + PROPOSED: to meet again 4 Oct per regular schedule
>                o scribe volutneer, please?
>           + Let's continue these without discussion:
>                o ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on
>                  op:dateTime triple
>                o ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve
>                o ACTION: SteveH to review the relevant test case re:
IRI
>                  normalization (ref [6]28 Jun discussion)
>                o ACTION: AndyS to add the above graph test cases
>                  (analagous to valueTesting test cases) ref [7]ftf5
BOS
>                  discussion

This is done

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/att-0446/
dawg-13sep.html__charset_ISO-8859-1



>                o ACTION: ericp to draft lang-match design, summarizing
>                  and citing RFC3066
>           + Comments on the agenda?
>     2. Protocol Last Call
>           + ACTION: EricP: publish proto-wd v 1.68 + changes from as
>             LCWD. [8]DONE
>             Namespace documents OK now? publish a fix?
>     3. SPARQL Protocol and WSDL
>           + ACTION: LeeF to draft WSDL 1.1 for SPARQL thingy with
AndyS
>             and Elias
>           + ACTION: DanC to ask WSDL WG to review WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2
>             SPARQL protocol stuff, once both are available
>           + ACTION: KC to work with WSDL WG on describing POST binding
>             with application/x-form-encoded in WSDL 2
>           + ACTION: KC to work with WSDL WG on moving "style" from
>             interface to binding
>     4. issues#sort
>           + ACTION: EricP to extend < and relational ops to string,
get
>             review by Andy. [9]done/progress
>           + ACTION: DanC to ask I18N WG for review of < on strings
>           + ACTION: DaveB to find query with FILTER on URIs
>     5. BASE IRI resolution comment
>           + ACTION: ericP to send [OK?] message to Bjoern. re [10]BASE
>             IRI resolution comment
>     6. issues#valueTesting: handling type "error"s
>           + ACTION DaveB: add to test suite the temperature case from
>             comment on truth tables in [11]commentor's message
>           + ACTION EricP: respond to [12]comment on valueTesting issue
>           + note [13]Type errors with xsd:boolean arguments from DaveB
>             19Sep
>     7. issues#rdfSemantics, issues#owlDisjunction
>           + Note [14]thoughts from Tuesday telecon regarding 20 Sep
>             teleconference. Any chance we can have a proposal ready to
>             decide in our 4 Oct meeting?
>     8. SPARQL QL grammar
>           + ACTION DaveB: review SyntaxDev grammar tests. [15]DONE.
>             Looks like a thumbs-up.
>           + ACTION SteveH: review the SyntaxDev grammar tests
>     9. issues#badIRIRef
>           + We resolved this 13 Sep; where are we on spec text and
>             getting back to the commentor?

Last proposed text was:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0437.html

"""
Grammar production <a>Q_IRI_REF</a> forms IRI references in accordance
with 
the generic syntax of IRI references described in section 2.2. of
[RFC3987].
"""

DanC: Is that OK?

	Andy


> 
> References
> 
>    1. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
>    2. tel:+1.617.761.6200
>    3. irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
>    4. http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-irc
>    5.
>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/att-0446/
dawg-13sep.html__charset_ISO-8859-1
>    6. http://www.w3.org/2005/06/28-dawg-minutes
>    7. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf5-bos.html
>    8. http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-protocol-20050914/
>    9.
>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0484.html
>   10.
http://www.w3.org/mid/431e392a.225659671@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de
>   11.
>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Aug/003
0.html
>   12.
http://www.w3.org/mid/B27E3100-A366-496F-AC9A-A0E5257C3F80@w3.org
>   13.
>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0449.html
>   14.
>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0471.html
>   15.
>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0470.html
> 
> --
> -eric
> 
> office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC,
>                         Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University,
>                         5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520
>                         JAPAN
>         +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
> cell:   +81.90.6533.3882
> 
> (eric@w3.org)
> Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other
> than email address distribution. 

Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2005 12:58:21 UTC