W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2005

tidying references, removing link to test-manifest.n3 link; editorial, right?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:01:39 -0500
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1122166900.7049.402.camel@localhost>

Bjoern Hoehrmann commented on the unregistered N3 media type in

"please either
change the referenced document to use a registered media type or
remove the reference."

I removed the reference while tidying references in 1.436 

I propose that this is a strictly editorial change; according
to the the last call comment process we discussed 7 Jun
the chair confirms that changes are editorial, but
I can't judge my own work, so I'd like a couple other eyeballs,

In particular, I think our link to the XML 1.1 grammar notation
was normative all along, but that's the sort of thing I want
to confirm explicitly.

Once it's confirmed that this is an editorial change, I'm
willing to respond to Hoehrmann on behalf of the editors
and ask him if he's satisfied (unless one of the editors
would prefer to do it).

I guess there's no straightforward way to isolate the
test-manifest.n3 change from all the references changes, so they
kinda go together; i.e. I'm proposing this as our response to
these comment as well:

  missing references in appendix 


XML 1.1 EBNF normative

I don't want to treat this one as editorial; I think we should do
some test cases for it:

RFC 3066 reference normative 

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Sunday, 24 July 2005 01:01:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:36 UTC