- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:35:51 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: > On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 18:04 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > >>In response to a couple comments... >>missing references in appendix >>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Jul/0037.html >> >>XML 1.1 EBNF normative >>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Jul/0029.html >> >>I'm doing an audit of the references. > > [...] > >>When I get a clean run, I intend to check in rq23/Overview.html >>(with fairly detailed change log, of course). > > > OK... done... > > Revision 1.436 2005/07/24 00:15:01 connolly > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#references > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#chlog Great! > > > I wasn't sure how to resolve these, so I have left them outstanding: > > > link is neither local, part, informative, nor normative: > [Unicode Security Considerations] > "http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr36/" > > > link is neither local, part, informative, nor normative: > [This has been noted by RDF-core] > "http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-literalsubjects" > > > link is neither local, part, informative, nor normative: > [<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil>] > "http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_nil" > > > link is neither local, part, informative, nor normative: > [<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>] > "http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_type" > > > link is neither local, part, informative, nor normative: > [http://www.w3.org/2004/07/xpath-functions] > "http://www.w3.org/2004/07/xpath-functions" > > > I don't understand why there are links to rdf-schema. I can explain the schema links: they are links for constants used in SPARQL. rdf:nil and rdf:type. RDF Collections are in rdf:nil is in RDF schema and SPARQL has list syntax to agree with that and mentions rdf:nil (i.e the rdf collection "()") Similarly for "a" - rq23 says it stands for rdf:type and links to that URI. So a RDF schema link should be normative (or remove the links and leave the bytes for the URI not in a <a> but that woudl be shame). > > I wonder if the unicode security considerations reference should > be moved to the protocol. (more on that separately). > > The link to #rdfms-literalsubjects uses odd hypertext style. I'm > not sure what to make of it just now. We could remove it but leaving the quote as explanation (maybe without a link, pref with a link) seems better. > > And I don't quite understand the role of the 07/xpath-functions > namespace. An example would sure help. > Andy
Received on Monday, 25 July 2005 12:36:56 UTC