- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 16:35:17 +0100
- To: kendall@monkeyfist.com
- CC: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Kendall Clark wrote back very quickly: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 03:36:23PM +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote: . . . >>==== 3. query Fault Messages >> >>NB "3" - should be "4" >> >>It talks about 2 faults then lists 3. > > > Really? I only see two faults: MalformedQuery, QueryRequestRefused. Thelist (v1.56) is <xs:element name="malformed-query"></xs:element> <xs:element name="query-request-refused"></xs:element> <xs:element name="fault-details" type="xs:string"></xs:element> which is 3 one of which is called "fault-details" I think the list should be: <fault name="MalformedQuery" element="st:faultDetails"/> <fault name="QueryRequestRefused" element="st:faultDetails"/> > > >>"malformed-query" and "query-request-refused" in the XML in the doc but >>"MalformedQuery" and "QueryRequestRefused" in the XSD and elsewhere. > > > I have to clear this up; I think I did it because of different naming > conventions, but it's probably a bug. Will fix. > > >>Some blank lines in the XSD file would be nice. >> >>---- >> >>""" >>MalformedQuery >> >>This fault message must be returned when the SPARQL query string is not a >>legal sequence of characters in the language defined by the SPARQL grammar. >>(Other cases?) >>""" >>that could be argued to apply if you had a blank node fake URI <_:abcd> :-) > > > Hmmm, not sure I understand yr point. Just that <_:abcd> is illegal as an IRI. This MalformedQuery does not allow much wiggle room for (non-standard) language extensions using the protocol. A SPARQL Protocol service MUST bounce illegal queries so can't use the protocol with non-absolutely-correct-SPARQL queries which is what I though UMD wanted. "legal sequence of characters" can be read as "legal by the grammar" or "legal by the grammar and any other rules that apply". > > >>==== B. HTTP Bindings >>"examples exemplify invocation" >>examples usually do exemplify! > > > Except when they don't. :> > > Will tweak. > > Thanks for the eyeball-time. Thanks for the quick reply. > > Cheers, > Kendall Clark
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2005 15:35:56 UTC