- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 19:45:28 -0500
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
A while ago, I wrote about... specifying extended valueTesting without reference to implementations http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0107 but I eventually let it go. Bjoern Hoehrmann commented on it in... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Jul/0032.html so let's take another look. I can think of a few cases: - user-defined functions/operators - calling functions with args outside the domain I still think we should make no reference to "implementations" in the QL spec; just specify the semantics of the language. I'd like to keep software conformance issues out of the QL spec and in the protocol spec. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Sunday, 24 July 2005 00:45:34 UTC