- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:11:26 -0500
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 15:35 +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote: [...] > I'm not disagreeing - publishing all the grammar we have is a good > thing. Why is my suggestion - which was just supposed to be more detail > on yours - wrong? Put grammars in a directory near the rec and link to > them. OK, I misread your message. Sorry. so... something like rq23/gr24/* you could call them rq23/grammar/* but then people might assume from the URI that they're normative grammar representations, but as you say, we're not sure to what extent we can vouch for them... > I'd be happier if I could get a positive confirmation that they had all > run the test suite. > > Andy -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2005 16:11:35 UTC