W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2005

RE: rq23 grammar update

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:11:26 -0500
To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1125418286.16011.414.camel@dirk>

On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 15:35 +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> I'm not disagreeing - publishing all the grammar we have is a good
> thing.  Why is my suggestion - which was just supposed to be more detail
> on yours - wrong?  Put grammars in a directory near the rec and link to
> them.

OK, I misread your message. Sorry.

so... something like rq23/gr24/*

you could call them rq23/grammar/* but then people might assume
from the URI that they're normative grammar representations, but
as you say, we're not sure to what extent we can vouch for them...

> I'd be happier if I could get a positive confirmation that they had all
> run the test suite.  
> 	Andy
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2005 16:11:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:36 UTC