- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 20:33:00 +0100
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > There was some confusion the last time we looked at this. The query > *seemed* like it should have no solutions. Further inspection showed > that the solutions come from identical nodes matching. I propose that > ValueTesting/extendedType-eq-pass-result.n3 is correct and that the > WG approve it as a SPARQL test. > > +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ > | a1| a2| > |--------------------------------|--------------------------------| > |<http://www.../extendedType-0#a>|<http://www.../extendedType-0#a>| > |<http://www.../extendedType-0#b>|<http://www.../extendedType-0#b>| > +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ I ran this test and the results agreed with the results in CVS. Andy
Received on Monday, 1 August 2005 19:33:10 UTC