- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:31:10 -0500
- To: kendall@monkeyfist.com
- Cc: DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 10:54 -0400, Kendall Clark wrote: > Andy & Eric, > > I think that rq23 should at least refer to the ability to specify an RDF > dataset in the SPARQL protocol (and, further, to at least point to the > section in SPROT about resolving ambiguous datasets). I think that would > make the protocol doc a normative reference. > > The coupling between these two should be very loose, but I think it's too > lose currently. At the very minimum it should say something like "See > [SPROT] for more information about RDF datasets" *somewhere* in the query > language spec. Yes, I think an informative "For other ways of specifying datasets, see the protocol spec" is the way to go. > > If it already says this, please forgive me, and a pointer to where would be > nice. I couldn't find anything. > > Cheers, > Kendall Clark -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 29 July 2005 13:31:16 UTC