- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 13:28:02 -0500
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ 2005-08-02T14:30Z tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333 supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg log to appear:http://www.w3.org/2005/08/02-dawg-irc scribe: AndyS record for review:http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-dawg-minutes next meeting: 9 Aug scribe volunteer? continue the following without discussion: ACTION: ericP to add "don't normalize" to rq23 (perhaps supplied in 0096) ACTION: EricP to add test in 0096 to rq23 tests. label "approved" and ref http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-dawg-minutes ACTION: ericP to send [OK?] message to Bjoern ACTION: ericP to update rq23 to include the text of rq23/mime.txt reflect security concearns ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve ACTION: SteveH to review the relevant test case re: IRI normalization ref http://www.w3.org/2005/06/28-dawg-minutes#item06 ACTION: AndyS to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting test cases) (don't expect quick delivery) ref http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf5-bos.html#item05 comments on agenda? 2. ISSUE resultsMimeType DONE: DaveB to add mime type to results format http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0125.html DONE: EliasT to review XML Results mime-type registration "I've read the entire draft to be sent to the IETF and it looks good." http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0126.html DONE: DanC to review XML Results mime-type registration "1.55 looks good The changes in 1.56 and 1.57 look OK" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0140.html DONE: KendallC to update protocol spec w.r.t. results mime type DONE: KendallC to Check whether the results namespace is in protocol draft; if so, update. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/ 1.53 2005/07/27 19:42:14 DONE: AndyS to fix rq23 to reflect new results namespace http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ 1.448 2005/08/01 13:20:06 DONE: DaveB to update rf1 with new namespace http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/ ACTION: DaveB respond to "sparqlResults namespace" comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Jul/0039.html , after rq23 is updated Note new "[OK?]" convention. 3. SPARQL results publication DONE: DaveB to choose a term and define it http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/#defn-srd DONE: EricP to ask for namespace approval and put a document there http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql-results 1.4 ACTION: ericP to publish rf1 4. toward Protocol last call DONE: KendallC to use Dave's name for a results set doc in the protocol draft... http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/ 1.53 DONE: KendallC to consider flattening rdf-dataset DONE: KendallC to add security considerations section to proto draft, under 4. Policy... security considerations could use some eyeballs. DONE: KendallC to add POST binding to protocol doc http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/ 1.53 post binding could use some eyeballs... and tests (hmm...). Is 1.55 a last call candidate? I see some todos, but they all seem to be to provide examples. Can I get a couple reviewers? Hmm... testing framework? at least a mental experiment framework, if not bits... 5. SPARQL QL comment status and editorial comments I may play a game of "Zakim, pick a victim" for comments that we haven't done anything with... http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html ACTION: DanC to investigate having CVS commits send to the WG list 6. issue valueTesting DONE EricP/Andy: revise rq23 to remove reference to implementations/engines ACTION: EricP to finish extendedType-eq-pass-result.n3 "I propose that ValueTesting/extendedType-eq-pass-result.n3 is correct and that the WG approve it as a SPARQL test." http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0157.html Last call comments: Error handling http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Jul/0032.html and language tag issues http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Jul/0031 7. issue badIRIRef http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#badIRIRef comments QuotedIRIref too lax and IRIs vs RDF URI References WG discussion http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/thread.html#153 8. comment "Query forms should be resources, not operations" http://www.w3.org/mid/20050728190012.GE18852@markbaker.ca Hmm... 9. Test cases publication ACTION: DanC to check after August on SteveH regarding test preparation for publication as WG Note Other folks interested to do something sooner? [ tlt:localTime ( "Amsterdam" "Tue 4:30 PM" ), ( "Brussels" "Tue 4:30 PM" ), ( "Chicago" "Tue 9:30 AM" ), ( "Helsinki" "Tue 5:30 PM" ), ( "London" "Tue 3:30 PM" ), ( "New York" "Tue 10:30 AM" ), ( "Rome" "Tue 4:30 PM" ), ( "Tokyo" "Tue 11:30 PM" ), ( "Vancouver" "Tue 7:30 AM" ); tlt:startTimePage <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=02&month=08&year=2005&hour=14&min=30&sec=0>; cal:dtstart [ cal:dateTime "2005-08-02T14:30Z" ] ]. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 1 August 2005 18:28:10 UTC