- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 15:07:25 +0100
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 02:59:45 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote: > However, I've also noticed a couple of items in Red Ink that still need > thinking about: > > 1. How/if to record duplicates in results. (Section 2.3.3) > > When ORDER BY is given, the result format may record index="1", > index="2" on the <result> element. (Side issue - "may" or "should" do > this?) I dont see the point to this really, but how does it interact with OFFSET? Shouldn't the count start from OFFSET + 1? > However when there are duplicates should it generate indexes 1, 2, 2, 3 > where items #2 and #3 are duplicates? (A query with ORDER BY but no > SELECT DISTINCT). Strong "no" from me. Any numbering should be monotonic. - Steve
Received on Wednesday, 13 July 2005 14:07:50 UTC