W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 6 Sep

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 12:14:36 -0400
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20050905161436.GA26708@monkeyfist.com>

On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 10:33:36AM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:

> comments on agenda?

Yes, see below.

> It's based on
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ 1.480
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/ 1.63

I will announce 1.64 in a few hours, after I get all the changes checked in.
Sorry it didn't happen on Friday, but life (in the form of the birth of a
baby) intervened... :>

> 2. comment: Query forms should be resources, not operations
> BM and KC don't seem to have reached consensus. Hmm.
> 2005-09-05T00:36:22Z from distobj
> http://www.w3.org/mid/20050905003622.GR17056@markbaker.ca

I responded personally off-list, though I probably should have CC'd the
comments list. Sorry.

> 3. comment: SPARQL Protocol: inconsistent parameter names
> http://www.w3.org/mid/43130E85.6040707@aduna.biz
> Did anybody get back to the commentor?

No, but I will as soon as those changes filter into the public editor's
draft, which will be with 1.64.

> 4. Toward Protocol Last Call
> ACTION KC: update protocol spec to show that SPARQL services that export
> HTTP bindings must export the HTTP binding in this SPARQL protocol spec;
> likewise for SOAP

Done in 1.64.

> ACTION: KendallC to add editorial note to protocol spec showing that our
> WSDL is not kosher and it depends on their final decision.

Done in 1.64.

> ACTION: KendallC, to relax the query-result type to allow "equivalent
> serialization" [salt to taste] and leave out the
> whttp:outputSerialization param, note the conflict with the current WSDL
> spec, and take the risk that we'll have to come back if they say no

Done in 1.64.

> ACTION: KC to make conneg explicit in c. CONSTRUCT with simple RDF
> dataset and take accept: out elsewhere

Done in 1.64.

FYI: Elias is working to autogenerate all the protocol example HTTP traces,
but all of that stuff won't be updated till sometime tomorrow or Wednesday.
(But this is because I'm focusing on other stuff, not because Elias isn't
kicking a**!)

> ACTION EliasT: establish consistency between protocol examples and tests

The deliverables of this one will, as I said above, show up in the protocol
spec soon, but not in 1.64.

> ACTION: KC to work with WSDL WG on describing POST binding with
> application/x-form-encoded in WSDL 2
> ACTION: KC to work with WSDL WG on moving "style" from interface to
> binding

I haven't done this or sent these emails yet. But I still intend to do so.

Received on Monday, 5 September 2005 16:15:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:36 UTC