- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:12:47 -0500
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ 2005-08-16T14:30Z http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=16&month=08&year=2005&hour=14&min=30&sec=0 tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333 supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg log to appear:http://www.w3.org/2005/08/16-dawg-irc scribe: SteveH or else EricP regrets? did KendallC say he's at risk this week? record for review: Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2005-08-09 for review http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0243.html and ammendment from DanC next meeting: 23 Aug? 30 Aug? DanC is not available 23 Aug chair? scribe? continue the following without discussion: ACTION: DanC to investigate having CVS commits send to the WG list ACTION LeeF: draft WSDL 1.1 for SPARQL thingy with AndyS and Elias ETA 2 Sep ACTION DanC: ask WSDL WG to review WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2 SPARQL protocol stuff, once both are available comments on agenda? I'm running behind this week. There are some new last call comments that I haven't really even looked at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/ http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html and I haven't thoroughly reviewed public-rdf-dawg@w3.org traffic for agenda updates. 3. comment "Query forms should be resources, not operations" ACTION KendallC: write another draft response to Mark Baker's comment and send to WG for possible discussion 4. Protocol testing ACTION SteveH: elaborate "CONSTRUCT with content negotiation" into a test case ACTION DanC: extract and machine-check examples (ugh. no progress. :-( ) 5. toward protocol last call ACTION EricP: discuss conformance w.r.t. WSDL 2 with PLH and send some notes to the WG, preferably including suggested text for conformance ACTION KendallC: abstract/abbreviate http trace examples seems to be done-ish ACTION KendallC: fix d. ASK with simple RDF dataset...XML is wrong. ACTION EricP: review protocol document 1.58 ACTION SteveH: review proto-wd after Friday signal from KC, hopefully in time for monday's agenda or tuesday's telcon done-ish how close to last call are we? 6. WSDL V2 last call Any comments from the DAWG to WSDL folks? 7. "SPARQL Query Results XML Format: XML 1.1" comment http://www.w3.org/mid/1123099748.20865.18.camel@localhost ACTION DaveB: see if PLH would be satisfied with s/can/may/ in what he suggested 8. BASE IRI resolution comment ACTION: ericP to add "don't normalize" to rq23 (perhaps supplied in 0096) ACTION: EricP to add test in 0096 to rq23 tests. label "approved" and ref http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-dawg-minutes ACTION: ericP to send [OK?] message to Bjoern 9. issues#queryMimeType ACTION: ericP to update rq23 to include the text of rq23/mime.txt reflect security concearns 10. issues#valueTesting ACTION DaveB: make 'XXI'^^:romanNumeral = 21 and points nearby into test cases (or ask questions in email). 11. issues#badIRIRef ACTION AndyS: draft language re <foo###bar> errors ACTION AndyS: Use IRI ref not RDF URI ref as world has moved on (those are at least in progress) 12. test suite maintenance ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve ACTION: SteveH to review the relevant test case re: IRI normalization ref http://www.w3.org/2005/06/28-dawg-minutes#item06 ACTION: AndyS to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting test cases) (don't expect quick delivery) ref http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf5-bos.html#item05 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 15 August 2005 23:12:55 UTC