- From: Dave Beckett <Dave.Beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 09:19:51 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 21:21 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > Bjoern's point seems reasonably well made. > > http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql-results > > seems more consistent with precedent and hence > easier for XSLT/javascript programmers to deal with. > > Dave, what do you think? Sure, I have no problems with this. (As long as somebody doesn't ask for http://www.w3.org/sparql-results next time ;) However what about timing of this change? The query WD we just published is pointing at http://www.w3.org/2005/06/sparqlResults. Can we make a LC results WD with this different namespace now or should we wait till the next round of drafts? Also, as the namespace URI was a WG decision, it'll have to be voted on? "RESOLVED: http://www.w3.org/2005/06/sparqlResults for results namespace name" -- http://www.w3.org/2005/06/28-dawg-minutes Dave
Received on Friday, 22 July 2005 08:20:20 UTC