Re: [Fwd: Some typos in WD]

On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:27:53AM +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> 
> Corrections made based on this message - a coupel of exceptions inline.
> 
> Thanks to Olivier for the review.
> 
> Q for Eric near the end.
> 
> v1.483 committed
> 
> 	Andy
> 
> Olivier Corby wrote:
> > I have found these typos  in the   WD.
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Olivier.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2.2
> >
> > Definition : SPARQL Query
> >
> > The sentence below is present in the definition and repeated  in the
> > paragraph just below :
> > "The graph pattern of a query is called the query pattern"
> 
> Done
> 
> >
> >
> > 2.4
> >
> > Definition : Pattern Solution
> >
> > "The result f replacing every v in a graph pattern" ->
> > "The result f replacing every variable v in a graph pattern"
> 
> Done
> >
> >
> > 2.8
> >
> > Predicate-Object Lists
> >
> > "more than one triple pattern be employing" ->
> > "by employing"
> 
> Done
> >
> >
> > 7.
> >
> > Definition : RDF Dataset Graph Pattern
> >
> > (<u1> G1)  ->  (<u1>, G1)   (three times)
> >
> 
> Done
> >
> >
> > 8.3
> >
> > Restriction by Bound Variables
> >
> > Some variable names start with ? (?w ?whom) and some do not (mbox whom).
> >
> 
> Done
> 
> >
> >
> > 9.1
> >
> >
> > "providing more than IRI" ->
> > "providing more than one IRI"
> >
> 
> Done
> 
> >
> >
> > 9.2 Specifying Named Graphs
> >
> > "used to provide one, named graph"  ->
> > "used to provide one named graph"
> >
> 
> Done
> 
> >
> >
> > 9.3
> >
> > Solution for ?who is "Bob", "Alice" and not "Bob Hacker", "Alice Hacker"
> >
> >
> > "This query finds the mbox together, with" ->
> > "This query finds the mbox together with"
> 
> The document is correct ("who" comes from the dc:publisher not foaf:name).
> 
> >
> >
> > 10.1
> >
> > Definition : Projection
> >
> > "The projection of solution QS over a set" ->
> > "The projection of solution QSi over a set"
> 
> It's better with QSi => QS
> 
> >
> >
> > Definition : Distinct Solution Sequence
> >
> > "then write set(S) is the set" ->
> > "then write set(S) for the set"
> >
> 
> Done
> 
> >
> > 11
> >
> > Namespaces
> >
> > "XML Schema datatypes with the prefix op:" ->
> > "XML Schema datatypes with the prefix xs:"
> >
> 
> Done

I've followed your lead and s/xs:/xsd:/g

> 
> >
> > 11.1.1
> >
> > XML Schema []
> 
> Eric - is this going to be a reference?
> 
> I made it a ref the existing XMLSCHEMA-2 reference.

I think so. I moved the XMLSCHEMA-2 ref up to the earliest mention in
the section and labeled it "norm". I now have two normative refs in a
row, one directly to the document and one to the references section.

I don't think we needed a normative reference until the section on
casting functions, but figured that the first ref to it should be
normative if any ref is normative.

>
> >
> >
> >
> > 11.2.1.1
> >
> >
> > "When a operand" ->
> > "When an operand"
> >
> 
> Done
> 
> >
> >
> > 11.2.3.2
> >
> > "Queries with union and optionals" ->
> > "Queries with union and optional"
> 
> "Queries with unions and optionals"
> 
> >
> >
> > FILTER bound(?date)) ->
> > FILTER bound(?date)
> >
> 
> Done
> 
> >
> > Table 11.2
> >
> > "Casting in SPARQL is peformed" ->
> > "Casting in SPARQL is performed"
> >
> 
> Done
> 
> >
> > "the casting operatoins" ->
> > "the casting operations"
> 
> Done
> 
> 

-- 
-eric

office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC,
                        Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University,
                        5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520
                        JAPAN
        +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
cell:   +81.90.6533.3882

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.