Re: Experience with SPARQL/P/SOAP/Axis

Kendall Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 03:51:46PM +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> 
> 
>>WSDL 1.1. file attached, including a possible SOAP binding.
> 
> 
> Hmm. IIRC, WSDL 1.1 was never more than a W3C Note from MS & IBM. I don't
> see how we can use it normatively at all. When I go to W3C site, and when I
> ask web service experts in my lab, I get pointers to WSDL 2. There aren't
> many tools yet, of course.

I wasn't suggesting normative but either non-normative or a non-normative link 
to the WSDL 1.1 files may be of help to people.

	Andy

> 
> 
>>Summary:
>>+ Removing the rdf-dataset level and merging the elements simplifies
> 
> 
> Good suggestion, which I've incorporated. The editor's draft of the protocol
> spec and the WXS file agree with rq23 about the cardinality of rdf-dataset
> elements. 
> 
> 
>>+ Request for HTTP POST binding
> 
> 
> Yep, on my TODO list for a while. I put an initial bit of binding into the
> WSDL file for this.
> 
> 
>>+ Minor problem with defining the encoding for HTTP returns
> 
> 
> Yep. I don't know what to do about this. RDF/XML is XML, so I think the
> application/xml type isn't wrong, but it's not the most specific type...
> 
> 
>>2/ We should change "default-graph-uri" to be maxOccurs="unbounded" to align
>>with the WG description about multiple FROM URIs.
> 
> 
> Yep, I did this over a month ago, but forgot to update the public copy.
> Oops.
> 
> 
>>3/ I needed to define rdf:RDF, not just import the namespace.  I defined it 
>>as
>>an element with no further details about it.  JAXB happy (Java-XML binding).
> 
> 
> I haven't done this yet and am not convinced it's needed.
> 
> 
>>5/ Please include a whttp:methodDefault="POST" binding with an encoding of
>>application/x-www-form-urlencoded (which is not the default). 
> 
> 
> Done.
> 
> I also added a query-request-refused fault type, which gets serialized in
> HTTP as a 500 status code (which is the most general server-side fault code
> in HTTP, and the only one generic enough to work here, I think).
> 
> 
>>6/ I was not sure what the {http output serialization} should be because it
>>isn't only application/xml for result sets but also application/rdf+xml for 
>>a graph.
> 
> 
> Yep, I have to reread the WSDL2 HTTP binding stuff to see if there's
> anything we can do here. I said "application/xml" for now. 
> 
> Do we say anywhere that the RDF returned by CONSTRUCT query has to be
> RDF/XML? 
> 
> Kendall Clark
>

Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2005 11:22:24 UTC