www-style@w3.org from February 2000 by date

Tuesday, 29 February 2000

• Re: Horizontal rules L. David Baron
• Re: Horizontal rules Matthew Brealey
• Rounded corners Jonny Axelsson
• Re: box-sizing alternative Tantek Çelik
• Re: Horizontal rules Tantek Çelik
• RE: box-sizing alternative Joe Hewitt
• RE: box-sizing alternative Joe Hewitt
• Re: box-sizing alternative Tantek Çelik
• Re: Horizontal rules Matthew Brealey
• RE: box-sizing alternative Joe Hewitt
• RE: box-sizing alternative Joe Hewitt
• RE: box-sizing alternative Joe Hewitt
• Re: Innumerable UI WD errors Matthew Brealey
• RE: box-sizing alternative Matthew Brealey
• RE: box-sizing alternative Joe Hewitt
• RE: box-sizing alternative Matthew Brealey
• Re: box-sizing alternative Matthew Brealey
• Re: box-sizing alternative Matthew Brealey
• Re: box-sizing alternative Tantek Çelik
• Re: box-sizing alternative Joe Hewitt
• RE: box-sizing alternative Joe Hewitt
• RE: box-sizing alternative Joe Hewitt
• Re: box-sizing alternative firespring
• Re: box-sizing alternative Sjoerd Visscher
• Re: box-sizing alternative L. David Baron

Monday, 28 February 2000

• Problem with @page within @media Danny Poulson

Tuesday, 29 February 2000

• box-sizing alternative Joe Hewitt
• Re: Shrinkwrap Joe Hewitt
• Re: BR fantasai

Monday, 28 February 2000

• Re: Shrinkwrap fantasai
• Re: Block, inline, inline-level, block-level and inline block firespring
• Re: Setting the height of a BR element Matthew Brealey
• Ignore the message entitled 'UI WD', dated Saturday but arrived Monday Matthew Brealey
• Block, inline, inline-level, block-level and inline block Matthew Brealey

Sunday, 27 February 2000

• UI WD Matthew Brealey

Saturday, 26 February 2000

• Re: Setting the height of a BR element using CSS Matthew Brealey

Monday, 28 February 2000

• Re: Shrinkwrap Eric A. Meyer
• Re: Shrinkwrap Matthew Brealey
• Re: Table row padding erratum Matthew Brealey
• Re: Innumerable UI WD errors Matthew Brealey
• Re: Innumerable UI WD errors Tantek Çelik
• Re: generic fonts and italic vs oblique Todd Fahrner
• Re: Innumerable UI WD errors Matthew Brealey
• Re: generic fonts and italic vs oblique Chris Lilley

Sunday, 27 February 2000

• Innumerable UI WD errors Matthew Brealey
• Shrinkwrap fantasai
• 5.2.1 Key equivalents (Re: CSS3 User Interface working draft updated) Jonny Axelsson
• CSS Lists in XML Mark Baartse

Thursday, 24 February 2000

• Pseudo-element specificity calculation conflict in CSS2 Bloo

Friday, 25 February 2000

• Re: generic fonts and italic vs oblique Tim Bagot
• Re: What's an em Chris Lilley
• Re: Scale Chris Lilley
• Re: Table row padding erratum L. David Baron
• Re: monochrome Tim Bannister
• Re: Horizontal rules Allan Odgaard
• Re: monochrome John Lewis

Thursday, 24 February 2000

• Re: generic fonts and italic vs oblique Chris Lilley

Wednesday, 23 February 2000

• Jobs at W3C Bert Bos
• Re: Bidi - HTML vs. CSS Nir Dagan
• Re: Bidi - HTML vs. CSS Matthew Brealey

Tuesday, 22 February 2000

• Bidi - HTML vs. CSS Matthew Brealey
• Re: Horizontal rules Matthew Brealey
• Re: UI WD (compliant browser) Allan Odgaard
• Re: Horizontal rules Allan Odgaard
• Re: UI WD (compliant browser) Allan Odgaard
• RE: UI WD (compliant browser) Jelks Cabaniss
• Re: UI WD (compliant browser) Tantek Çelik
• Re: Inline styles are banished to legacy Walter Ian Kaye
• Re: Inline styles are banished to legacy Jonny Axelsson

Monday, 21 February 2000

• Re: Inline styles are banished to legacy Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Inline styles are banished to legacy Walter Ian Kaye
• RE: UI WD (compliant browser) Jelks Cabaniss
• Inline styles are banished to legacy Jelks Cabaniss
• Re: Scale JOrendorff@ixl.com
• Re: UI WD (compliant browser) Chris Lilley
• More french DAVID MORAN
• French? DAVID MORAN
• Re: UI WD (compliant browser) Matthew Brealey
• selectors and YakYak Daniel Glazman
• Re: UI WD (compliant browser) Walter Ian Kaye
• Re: UI WD (compliant browser) Tantek Çelik

Sunday, 20 February 2000

• Re: UI WD (compliant browser) Jan Roland Eriksson
• Re: Horizontal rules Matthew Brealey
• Re: UI WD (compliant browser) Allan Odgaard
• Re: UI WD (cursor) Matthew Brealey
• Re: UI WD (compliant browser) Matthew Brealey
• Re: UI WD Ian Hickson
• Re: UI WD (compliant browser) Tantek Çelik
• Re: UI WD (cursor) Tantek Çelik
• Re: UI WD Tantek Çelik

Saturday, 19 February 2000

• Re: Scale isoma
• Re: UI WD Matthew Brealey
• Re: UI WD Matthew Brealey
• Re: UI WD Ian Hickson
• Re: Scale Chris Lilley
• Re: UI WD Chris Lilley
• UI WD Matthew Brealey
• Scale Tim Bannister

Friday, 18 February 2000

• Re: Horizontal rules Allan Odgaard
• css3-userint correction Steffen Goeldner
• Re: Horizontal rules Matthew Brealey

Thursday, 17 February 2000

• Re: Horizontal rules Allan Odgaard

Friday, 18 February 2000

• Re: :first-letter errors and ambiguities Matthew Brealey

Thursday, 17 February 2000

• Re: Horizontal rules Matthew Brealey
• Re: Horizontal rules Allan Odgaard
• Re: Horizontal rules Matthew Brealey
• Re: generic fonts and italic vs oblique Matthew Brealey

Wednesday, 16 February 2000

• Re: generic fonts and italic vs oblique Sue Sims
• Re: Horizontal rules Allan Odgaard
• CSS3 User Interface working draft updated Tantek Çelik
• Re: What's an em Jan Roland Eriksson
• Re: monochrome Bert Bos

Tuesday, 15 February 2000

• Re:I'm the dreaded Newbie! Chatragadda Sunil Kumar
• Balanced Columns Byron Law

Wednesday, 16 February 2000

• Re: What's an em Clive Bruton
• generic fonts and italic vs oblique Erik van der Poel
• Re: monochrome Michael Hamm
• Re: monochrome isoma

Thursday, 17 February 2000

• Re: monochrome Matthew Brealey

Wednesday, 16 February 2000

• Re: monochrome Michael Hamm
• Heights of static block elements Matthew Brealey
• Re: Horizontal rules Matthew Brealey
• Re: monochrome Matthew Brealey
• Min/max-height erratum Matthew Brealey
• More :first-line/:first-letter errors Matthew Brealey
• Re: What's an em Matthew Brealey

Tuesday, 15 February 2000

• RE: Scrolling tables without frames JOrendorff@ixl.com
• Re: UI: Sizing fonts relative to UI fonts Todd Fahrner
• UI: Sizing fonts relative to UI fonts Braden N. McDaniel
• Re: monochrome Karl Ove Hufthammer

Monday, 14 February 2000

• Re: monochrome Garth Wallace
• monochrome Michael Hamm
• Re: :first-letter errors and ambiguities Matthew Brealey
• Re: What's an em Chris Lilley
• Re: What's an em Chris Lilley

Sunday, 13 February 2000

• Re: font-size and accents, again Erik van der Poel

Saturday, 12 February 2000

• Re: Horizontal rules fantasai

Friday, 11 February 2000

• Sorry, please ignore Bugs/suggestions (was Bugs/suggestions) Matthew Brealey
• Bugs/suggestions Matthew Brealey
• What does this mean? Matthew Brealey

Thursday, 10 February 2000

• Re: Logical gap in UI WD Tantek Çelik
• Re: Columns as ancestors [and a digression] Steve Clark
• Re: Columns as ancestors [and a digression] Matthew Brealey
• Re: Columns as ancestors [and a digression] Steve Clark
• RE: is this legal css? Bill dehOra
• Logical gap in UI WD Matthew Brealey
• Re: Columns as ancestors [and a digression] Matthew Brealey

Wednesday, 9 February 2000

• Re: identifiers Peter S. Linss
• Tables and the box model Matthew Brealey
• RE: is this legal css? Bill dehOra
• Re: identifiers Matthew Brealey
• Re: is this legal css? Matthew Brealey
• identifiers Bill dehOra
• is this legal css? Bill dehOra
• CSS Development slowdown? Simon St.Laurent

Monday, 7 February 2000

• Re: Annotating HTML DOM tree with CSS* properties Chatragadda Sunil Kumar

Friday, 4 February 2000

• Re: default value for @charset in CSS2 Yung-Fong Tang
• Re: default value for @charset in CSS2 Yung-Fong Tang

Monday, 7 February 2000

• Annotating HTML DOM tree with CSS* properties Chatragadda Sunil Kumar
• Re: Annotating HTML DOM tree with CSS* properties keshlam@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 8 February 2000

• Re: Selectors erratum (was Re: Various comments on selectors' Test) Matthew Brealey
• Re: Selectors erratum (was Re: Various comments on selectors' Test) Matthew Brealey

Sunday, 6 February 2000

• Re: :first-letter errors and ambiguities Chris Lilley
• Re: - O and CSS Chris Lilley

Monday, 7 February 2000

• Re: Collapsed border model conflict resolution difficulties David Perrell
• Re: Selectors erratum (was Re: Various comments on selectors' Test) Ian Hickson
• Selectors erratum (was Re: Various comments on selectors' Test) Matthew Brealey
• Table row padding erratum Matthew Brealey
• Re: line-height (was: inline h*ll) Matthew Brealey
• :first-letter and :first-line oversight Matthew Brealey
• Marker box and float interaction errors Matthew Brealey
• Inherit Matthew Brealey
• Re: Generated content Matthew Brealey
• Re: Collapsed border model conflict resolution difficulties Matthew Brealey

Sunday, 6 February 2000

• Re: Relative positioning firespring

Saturday, 5 February 2000

• Re: Platform Independant Cursors Chris Lilley
• Re: Minima and maxima Allan Odgaard
• Re: Baselines (was RE: Units, font sizing, and zoom suggestion for CSS 3) Erik van der Poel

Friday, 4 February 2000

• Re: Baselines (was RE: Units, font sizing, and zoom suggestion for CSS 3) Bert Bos
• Re: default value for @charset in CSS2 Erik van der Poel
• Re: Generated content L. David Baron
• Re: Collapsed border model conflict resolution difficulties L. David Baron
• RE: Horizontal rules melissa h.gormley
• Re: What's the use of visibility: collapse on table rows? L. David Baron
• Re: Columns as ancestors L. David Baron
• Re: background-attachment L. David Baron
• Re: Nightmare on generated content street Matthew Brealey
• :first-letter errors and ambiguities Matthew Brealey
• Collapsed border model conflict resolution difficulties Matthew Brealey
• Minima and maxima Matthew Brealey
• Rules as to position of table display types within tables? Matthew Brealey
• What's the use of visibility: collapse on table rows? Matthew Brealey
• Columns as ancestors Matthew Brealey
• background-attachment Matthew Brealey
• Re: Position of pending floats Matthew Brealey
• Re: Inline h*ll Matthew Brealey
• Re: Generated content Matthew Brealey
• Re: Relative positioning Matthew Brealey
• - O and CSS Matthew Brealey
• Re: line-height: <number> Erik van der Poel
• Re: line-height: <number> Ian Hickson
• Re: line-height: <number> Erik van der Poel
• Re: Position of pending floats Ian Hickson
• Re: line-height: <number> Ian Hickson

Thursday, 3 February 2000

• Re: Baselines (was RE: Units, font sizing, and zoom suggestion for CSS 3) Erik van der Poel
• Re: EM dashes (was: What's an em) John Hudson
• Re: Baselines (was RE: Units, font sizing, and zoom suggestion for CSS 3) Bert Bos
• Re: Baselines (was RE: Units, font sizing, and zoom suggestion for CSS 3) Erik van der Poel
• RE: :first-line errors JOrendorff@ixl.com
• Re: Visual effects Bert Bos
• Re: Phantom spaces Bert Bos
• Re: CSS entities? Bert Bos
• Re: :first-line errors Matthew Brealey
• Re: Platform Independant Cursors isoma
• Re: Baselines (was RE: Units, font sizing, and zoom suggestion for CSS 3) Bert Bos
• Re: :first-line errors Bert Bos
• RE: css, @media print - headers and footers ? Chris Wilson

Wednesday, 2 February 2000

• css, @media print - headers and footers ? Medlen Lukas

Tuesday, 1 February 2000

• Re: What's an em (was RE: Units, font sizing, and zoom suggestion for CSS 3) David Lemon

Wednesday, 2 February 2000

• Re: What's an em David Lemon

Tuesday, 1 February 2000

• Re: What's an em Just van Rossum

Wednesday, 2 February 2000

• Re: What's an em Clive Bruton
• Re: What's an em Clive Bruton
• Re: What's an em Clive Bruton
• Re: What's an em Clive Bruton
• Re: What's an em Prof. Erik Spiekermann
• Re: What's an em Jelle Bosma

Tuesday, 1 February 2000

• Re: What's an em Just van Rossum

Monday, 17 January 2000

• Re: Inline formatting model document Håkon Wium Lie
• Re: Inline formatting model document Håkon Wium Lie

Wednesday, 2 February 2000

• Re: EM Clive Bruton

Monday, 24 January 2000

• Re: Best practice for font control Christian Ottosson

Wednesday, 2 February 2000

• RE: What's an em Clive Bruton
• RE: What's an em Clive Bruton

Tuesday, 1 February 2000

• RE: What's an em Just van Rossum
• Platform Independant Cursors Chatragadda Sunil Kumar

Wednesday, 2 February 2000

• RE: What's an em Todd Fahrner
• RE: What's an em Karlsson Kent - keka
• RE: What's an em Karlsson Kent - keka
• RE: What's an em Karlsson Kent - keka
• Re: Relative positioning Sjoerd Visscher
• Font adjustments (was Re: what's an em) Karlsson Kent - keka
• Re: Relative positioning firespring
• Re: Best practice for font control Walter Ian Kaye
• Re: What's an em Erik van der Poel
• EM dashes (was: What's an em) Jelks Cabaniss
• Re: What's an em Todd Fahrner
• Re: What's an em Erik van der Poel
• Re: What's an em Erik van der Poel

Tuesday, 1 February 2000

• line-height: <number> Erik van der Poel
• Re: What's an em Erik van der Poel
• Re: What's an em Erik van der Poel
• Absolute positioning (was: Relative positioning) JOrendorff@ixl.com
• Re: What's an em Todd Fahrner
• Re: What's an em Erik van der Poel
• Re: What's an em Erik van der Poel
• RE: What's an em Karlsson Kent - keka
• Re: Relative positioning Sjoerd Visscher
• Re: Relative positioning firespring
• Re: Relative positioning Sjoerd Visscher

Last message date: Tuesday, 29 February 2000 16:46:22 UTC