- From: Walter Ian Kaye <walter@natural-innovations.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 15:13:17 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
At 05:04p -0500 02/21/00, Jelks Cabaniss didst inscribe upon an electronic papyrus: >Just curious: do some folks here think the HTML WG's decision to banish the >style attribute to the Legacy dungeon for XHTML 1.1 is a Good Thing? B and I >elements are apparently still cool, yet consensus was evidently reached in the >HTML WG as to inline-CSS deprecation. I know *some* here oppose it (as do I >unless convinced otherwise); I would like to hear counter-arguments from those >here who think that it is indeed a good thing to do. Let's take a real-world example. I use CSS for syntax coloring on <http://www.natural-innovations.com/as/snippets.html> (yes, that's a Mac-oriented page for an obvious reason). I'd like to know how the syntax coloring could ever be done without inline styles. Well, unless I were to make new tags for each syntax part, but then it wouldn't be HTML anymore. -boo
Received on Monday, 21 February 2000 18:14:09 UTC