- From: Matthew Brealey <thelawnet@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2000 14:23:13 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <389B5151.1DB@yahoo.com>
Min-width's initial value should be 0 (rather than ua-determined). There is nothing particularly complicated about zero-width elements - I cannot see anything intrinsically complicated about rendering: <P style="width: 0"> Some text in a P element. </P> As: Some text in a P element. , with the entirety of each word overflowing the containing block. There is also a discrepancy with max-width and max-height as compared with width and height. <blockquote cite="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/syndata.html#length-units"> Some properties allow negative length values, but this may complicate the formatting model and there may be implementation-specific limits. If a negative length value cannot be supported, it should be converted to the nearest value that can be supported. </blockquote> <blockquote cite="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/visudet.html#the-width-property"> Negative values for 'width' are illegal. </blockquote> So, <p style="max-width: -100px"> Some text. </p> results in a width of 0 pixels (since negative max-widths are not illegal and since the negative length will be clipped) , whereas <p style="width: -100px"> Some text. </p> is illegal, and hence will be ignored and treated as width: auto. Equally for max-height.
Received on Friday, 4 February 2000 09:21:40 UTC