- From: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 05:02:53 -0800
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Matthew Brealey wrote: <snip> > Yes. I have pointed this out in respect of the 'spinning' type. Needless > to say, my arguments have fallen on deaf ears. I have not seen that comment made previously. Was it made on www-style? I must have missed it. Please repeat (or provide a link to) your feedback re: the 'spinning' cursor value. If you have a suggestion for a better name, please let me know. > Chris Lilley wrote: >> So, the CSS WG decided to use a different name, > > and one that I support entirely, if it wasn't for the fact of the > implemented base. I believe there are also shipping implementations of 'cursor:pointer' out there as well. Tantek
Received on Sunday, 20 February 2000 08:03:33 UTC