- From: Bloo <bloo@blooberry.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 03:39:25 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-style@w3.org
I looked for clarification in the errata, but I did not see any - is this a known problem or a non-issue that I am not seeing through on first glance? The following two points seem to directly conflict to even the casual reader: <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/cascade.html#cascading-order> Point 3: "The secondary sort is by specificity of selector: more specific selectors will override more general ones. Pseudo-elements and pseudo-classes are counted as normal elements and classes, respectively." <URL:http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/cascade.html#specificity> 4th bullet: "ignore pseudo-elements." -Brian -- Brian Wilson -----------------------"Those aren't Sex muffins! -Coach bloo@blooberry.com ------------------Those aren't Love muffins! http://www.blooberry.com/ -----------Those are just BLOOberry muffins!" Creator of Index DOT Html/Css: http://www.blooberry.com/indexdot/
Received on Saturday, 26 February 2000 15:01:13 UTC