w3c-wai-ig@w3.org from July to September 2004 by date

Thursday, 30 September 2004

• GAWDS new website design now live Jim Byrne

Monday, 27 September 2004

• Re: Fw: FW: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 david poehlman
• Re: Fw: FW: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 TANAKA Satoko

Sunday, 26 September 2004

• Re: Fw: FW: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 david poehlman
• Re: Fw: FW: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 TANAKA Satoko

Saturday, 25 September 2004

• Re: Fw: FW: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 david poehlman
• Re: Fw: FW: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 TANAKA Satoko

Friday, 24 September 2004

• Job posting for an Accessibility Expert Longoria, Roman G
• Fw: newspaper website offering a braille-friendly file Ineke van der Maat
• Fw: Mozilla content keyboard navigation proposal - feedback sought ASAP! david poehlman
• newspaper website offering a braille-friendly file Jim Tobias

Tuesday, 21 September 2004

• ATutor 1.4.2 Release info@atutor.ca
• RE: Pop up navigation bar Next Design | Luca Mascaro ::.
• Pop up navigation bar Luis Fernando Llana Díaz

Monday, 20 September 2004

• RE: Title attribute for form label Jim Thatcher
• Re: Title attribute for form label Sailesh Panchang
• Sidar Jornadas postponed due to inclement weather (Hurricane Jeanne) Charles McCathieNevile

Saturday, 18 September 2004

• newspaper website offering a braille-friendly file? Jim Tobias

Thursday, 16 September 2004

• fw: Mozilla content keyboard navigation proposal - feedback sought ASAP! david poehlman
• URI oops Re: Is this FOO ok Re: HTML Table Markup Charles McCathieNevile
• Crystal Reports 10 and Web Accessibility Strange, Lainie
• Is this FOO ok Re: HTML Table Markup Charles McCathieNevile

Wednesday, 15 September 2004

• Re: Re[2]: Diabetes websites too complicated Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Re[2]: Diabetes websites too complicated Charles McCathieNevile
• Re:W3C, not spam, was... Weather Report: Request for Appraisal Access Systems
• RE: Diabetes websites too complicated Ianl@dyslexic.com
• Re: Weather Report: Request for Appraisal David Woolley
• Re: Re[2]: Diabetes websites too complicated David Woolley
• Re: Diabetes websites too complicated David Woolley
• Re: Weather Report: Request for Appraisal John Britsios
• Weather Report: Request for Appraisal Matthew Smith

Tuesday, 14 September 2004

• RE: Re[2]: Diabetes websites too complicated John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re[2]: Diabetes websites too complicated Mike Brown
• PBS show takes a look at AT zara
• RE: Diabetes websites too complicated Access Systems
• RE: Diabetes websites too complicated John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Including stuff Re: W3C Roadmap Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Diabetes websites too complicated Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Diabetes websites too complicated Matthew Smith
• Re: Diabetes websites too complicated Mike Brown
• Diabetes websites too complicated Alan Chuter
• Re: HTML Table Markup david poehlman

Monday, 13 September 2004

• Re: W3C Roadmap David Woolley
• Re: HTML Table Markup David Woolley
• Re: HTML Table Markup Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: HTML Table Markup Isofarro
• Re: HTML Table Markup Phill Jenkins
• Re: HTML Table Markup Isofarro
• Re: HTML Table Markup Phill Jenkins
• Re: HTML Table Markup Ineke van der Maat
• Re: HTML Table Markup Tina Holmboe
• Re: HTML Table Markup Phill Jenkins
• Re: HTML Table Markup Tina Holmboe
• Re: HTML Table Markup Phill Jenkins
• Re: HTML Table Markup Phill Jenkins
• Re: HTML Table Markup david poehlman
• Re: HTML Table Markup david poehlman
• Re: HTML Table Markup david poehlman
• Re: HTML Table Markup Ineke van der Maat
• Re: W3C Roadmap Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: HTML Table Markup Tina Holmboe
• Re: HTML Table Markup David Woolley
• Re: Fw: FW: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 Phill Jenkins
• Re: HTML Table Markup Phill Jenkins
• RE: HTML Table Markup Phill Jenkins
• RE: W3C Roadmap Geoff Deering

Sunday, 12 September 2004

• Re: W3C Roadmap david poehlman
• RE: W3C Roadmap Geoff Deering
• Re: W3C Roadmap David Woolley
• Re: W3C Roadmap david poehlman
• RE: W3C Roadmap Geoff Deering
• Re: W3C Roadmap Charles McCathieNevile
• W3C Roadmap Geoff Deering

Friday, 10 September 2004

• RE: HTML Table Markup Chris Ridpath
• Re: Fw: FW: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 david poehlman
• Re: Fw: FW: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 Matthew Smith
• Re: Fw: FW: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 david poehlman
• Re: Fw: FW: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 Tina Holmboe
• RE: HTML Table Markup Bailey, Bruce
• Re: HTML Table Markup Chris Ridpath
• RE: HTML Table Markup Bailey, Bruce
• Re: HTML Table Markup Ineke van der Maat
• Re: HTML Table Markup Chris Ridpath
• RE: HTML Table Markup Bailey, Bruce
• Fw: FW: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 Ineke van der Maat
• Re: FW: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 david poehlman
• RE: FW: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: HTML Table Markup Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: HTML Table Markup Chris Ridpath
• RE: HTML Table Markup John Colby
• Re: HTML Table Markup david poehlman
• Re: HTML Table Markup Chris Ridpath
• Re: FW: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 David Woolley
• Re: FW: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 David Woolley
• Re: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 david poehlman
• Re: FW: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 david poehlman

Thursday, 9 September 2004

• RE: FW: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: HTML Table Markup Sailesh Panchang
• RE: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 Jon Gunderson
• Re: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 Ineke van der Maat
• Re: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 Jon Gunderson
• RE: HTML Table Markup Bailey, Bruce
• RE: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 Jon Gunderson
• Re: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 Sailesh Panchang
• RE: HTML Table Markup Chris Ridpath
• RE: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 Cheryl D Wise
• RE: HTML Table Markup John M Slatin
• Fwd: FW: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 Tina Holmboe
• RE: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 John M Slatin
• Re: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 Tina Holmboe
• Re: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 david poehlman
• Re: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 Tina Holmboe
• Re: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 david poehlman
• RE: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 Juan Ulloa
• RE: HTML Table Markup Bailey, Bruce
• On-line course on accessible web design starts September 30th Jon Gunderson
• HTML Table Markup Chris Ridpath
• Re: Skip navigation in WCAG-2 david poehlman
• Skip navigation in WCAG-2 Jesper Tverskov

Wednesday, 8 September 2004

• RE: article: accessibility is just another language: John M Slatin
• article: accessibility is just another language: david poehlman
• article: accessibility is just another language: david poehlman

Tuesday, 7 September 2004

• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 Access Systems

Monday, 6 September 2004

• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 John M Slatin

Saturday, 4 September 2004

• Re: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? Alastair Campbell

Friday, 3 September 2004

• Re: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH William R Williams
• RE: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? William R Williams
• Re: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? Sailesh Panchang
• RE: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? John M Slatin
• Re: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? Sailesh Panchang
• New 3D surface pin table (possible accessibility uses) Kristina Seyer Smith
• Re: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? david poehlman
• Re: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? Sailesh Panchang
• RE: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? Bailey, Bruce
• RE: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? Jennifer Sutton
• Re: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? Phill Jenkins
• RE: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? Bailey, Bruce
• RE: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? Bailey, Bruce
• RE: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? John M Slatin
• Re: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? Sailesh Panchang
• RE: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? Bailey, Bruce
• RE: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? John M Slatin
• Re: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? Tina Holmboe
• Does 5.1 absolutely require TH? Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Until user agents Jesper Tverskov

Thursday, 2 September 2004

• Best practices in online captioning Joe Clark
• Until user agents Jesper Tverskov
• RE: The title attribute is 99% bad John Foliot - WATS.ca

Wednesday, 1 September 2004

• Re: The title attribute is 99% bad david poehlman
• Re: The title attribute is 99% bad David R. Stong
• Re: Reccomendations, images in PDF or MS Word files Jon Gunderson
• RE: Reccomendations, images in PDF or MS Word files John M Slatin
• Reccomendations, images in PDF or MS Word files Tipton, William
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Alastair Campbell
• Re: The title attribute is 99% bad Kynn Bartlett
• re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Jesper Tverskov
• RE: The title attribute is 99% bad John M Slatin
• RE: The title attribute is 99% bad Mark Gristock
• RE: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Patrick Lauke

Tuesday, 31 August 2004

• re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Lois Wakeman

Wednesday, 1 September 2004

• Re: The title attribute is 99% bad Jesper Tverskov
• The title attribute is 99% bad Jesper Tverskov

Tuesday, 31 August 2004

• Re: possible alternative to css hiding with display:none etc Matthew Smith
• Re: possible alternative to css hiding with display:none etc David Woolley

Monday, 30 August 2004

• RE: possible alternative to css hiding with display:none etc Rebecca Cox
• possible alternative to css hiding with display:none etc Rebecca Cox
• Re: Animated Gifs and Screen readers Matthew Smith
• RE: Animated Gifs and Screen readers Michael R. Burks
• Re: Summary="" spells disaster Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Animated Gifs and Screen readers Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Summary="" spells disaster david poehlman
• Summary="" spells disaster Jesper Tverskov
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 Access Systems
• RE: Animated Gifs and Screen readers Emmanuelle Gutierrez y Restrepo
• Re: Animated Gifs and Screen readers Patrick H. Lauke
• Animated Gifs and Screen readers Michael R. Burks
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 david poehlman
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 Joe Clark
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute david poehlman
• RE: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Bart Simons
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute david poehlman
• RE: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute John M Slatin
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 Lisa Seeman
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 david poehlman
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute david poehlman
• RE: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Bart Simons
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Jesper Tverskov
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Jesper Tverskov
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 Lisa Seeman
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 Claire Spencer
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 Lisa Seeman

Saturday, 28 August 2004

• RE: New York Attorney General holds ADA applies to Web Businesses. Jim Thatcher
• ANN: formsPlayer combines XForms and the CSS3 Speech Module to produce multimodal forms Mark Birbeck
• RE: New York Attorney General holds ADA applies to Web Businesses. Cheryl D Wise
• RE: New York Attorney General holds ADA applies to Web Businesses. Jim Thatcher
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute David Dorward
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute david poehlman
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Joe Clark
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Joe Clark
• Re: Is there a case for News as accessible technology? Access Systems
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 Access Systems

Friday, 27 August 2004

• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Kerstin Goldsmith
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute david poehlman
• RE: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute John M Slatin
• RE: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute John M Slatin
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute david poehlman
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute david poehlman
• RE: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute John M Slatin
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute david poehlman
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute david poehlman
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Kerstin Goldsmith
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Kerstin Goldsmith
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute John M Slatin
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute david poehlman
• RE: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute John M Slatin
• RE: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Elizabeth J. Pyatt
• XML editor that works with JAWS John M Slatin
• RE: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Phill Jenkins
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute david poehlman
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Alastair Campbell
• RE: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: Legal status of WCAG Re: Who needs what ... Phill Jenkins
• RE: Legal status of WCAG -and back to Who needs what ... stephen.peterson@mnr.gov.on.ca
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute david poehlman
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute david poehlman
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Elizabeth J. Pyatt
• RE: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Derek Featherstone
• Dropdown menu and OnFocus events David Quinton
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Jesper Tverskov
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Elizabeth J. Pyatt
• RE: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Derek Featherstone
• RE: Legal status of WCAG -and back to Who needs what ... John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Loretta Guarino Reid
• Fw: Building Ramps Instead of Creating Barriers david poehlman
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Alastair Campbell
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Jesper Tverskov
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Jesper Tverskov

Thursday, 26 August 2004

• Re: Legal status of WCAG -and back to Who needs what ... Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Is W3C Technology Fragmented or Unified? Geoff Deering
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute david poehlman
• RE: Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute John M Slatin
• Layout versus data tables proposal for null summary attribute Phill Jenkins
• RE: the ramp to nowhere: Juan Ulloa
• Re: the ramp to nowhere: david poehlman
• RE: the ramp to nowhere: Juan Ulloa
• Re: the ramp to nowhere: david poehlman
• Re: PDF specs (was PDF in WCAG 2) david poehlman
• RE: RE: PDF in WCAG 2 John Foliot - WATS.ca
• PDF specs (was PDF in WCAG 2) Joe Clark
• RE: the ramp to nowhere: Juan Ulloa
• Re: RE: PDF in WCAG 2 lguarino@adobe.com
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 John Foliot - WATS.ca
• RE: Is W3C Technology Fragmented or Unified? Lisa Seeman
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 lguarino@adobe.com
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Stephanie Sullivan
• Re: the ramp to nowhere: david poehlman
• Re: the ramp to nowhere: david poehlman
• Re: the ramp to nowhere: david poehlman
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Kerstin Goldsmith
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 david poehlman
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 John Foliot - WATS.ca

Wednesday, 25 August 2004

• RE: Who needs what Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 Geek Chic
• RE: Is W3C Technology Fragmented or Unified? Geoff Deering
• RE: Who needs what Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 Laura Carlson
• RE: the ramp to nowhere: Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com
• RE: the ramp to nowhere: RUST Randal
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: the ramp to nowhere: Juan Ulloa
• RE: the ramp to nowhere: Mark Gristock
• Usaccessibility Re: Who needs what Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 Charles McCathieNevile
• the ramp to nowhere: david poehlman
• Re: Breadcrumbs Phill Jenkins
• RE: Who needs what Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 Mark Gristock
• RE: Is W3C Technology Fragmented or Unified? Patrick Lauke
• Lawyers, angels and pinheads Re: Who needs what Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Who needs what Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 RUST Randal
• Re: Breadcrumbs Jon Gunderson
• RE: Who needs what Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 Mark Gristock
• RE: Is W3C Technology Fragmented or Unified? RUST Randal
• RE: Is W3C Technology Fragmented or Unified? Geoff Deering
• RE: Who needs what Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 RUST Randal
• RE: Who needs what Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 Mark Gristock
• Re: Who needs what Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 david poehlman
• RE: Who needs what Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 RUST Randal
• RE: Is W3C Technology Fragmented or Unified? RUST Randal
• RE: Who needs what Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 RUST Randal
• Re: Who needs what Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 Alastair Campbell
• Abbr and acronym in WCAG 2 Jesper Tverskov

Tuesday, 24 August 2004

• Re: Legal status of WCAG Re: Who needs what ... zara
• Is W3C Technology Fragmented or Unified? Geoff Deering
• RE: Legal status of WCAG Re: Who needs what ... Martin Sloan
• RE: Who needs what Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 John M Slatin
• RE: Voice Web Geoff Deering
• Re: Voice Web Phill Jenkins
• Voice Web Geoff Deering
• Re: Legal status of WCAG Re: Who needs what ... Andy Heath
• Legal status of WCAG Re: Who needs what ... Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Who needs what Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 William R Williams
• RE: Who needs what Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 RUST Randal
• Who needs what Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 RUST Randal
• Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 Jesper Tverskov

Monday, 23 August 2004

• Re: New York Attorney General holds ADA applies to Web Businesses. Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: New York Attorney General holds ADA applies to Web Businesses. Sailesh Panchang
• Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 Joe Clark
• Re: New York Attorney General holds ADA applies to Web Businesses. Isofarro
• RE: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0) William R Williams
• RE: New York Attorney General holds ADA applies to Web Businesses. Phill Jenkins
• RE: Accessibility humanized John M Slatin
• Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 tom mcCain
• Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 Harry Loots
• RE: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0) Ianl@dyslexic.com
• Re: Accessibility humanized Alastair Campbell
• A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0 RUST Randal
• Re: Accessibility humanized david poehlman
• Re: Accessibility humanized Andy Budd

Sunday, 22 August 2004

• RE: Accessibility humanized Harry Woodrow

Saturday, 21 August 2004

• Re: Accessibility humanized david poehlman
• RE: Accessibility humanized John M Slatin
• Re: Fw: Accessibility humanized david poehlman
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: Fw: Accessibility humanized Tina Holmboe
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 david poehlman
• Fw: Accessibility humanized david poehlman
• Fw: Balancing visual and structural complexity in interaction design david poehlman
• RE: New York Attorney General holds ADA applies to Web Businesses. Jim Tobias
• Fw: RE: New York Attorney General holds ADA applies to Web Businesses. Harry Loots
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Harry Loots
• RE: New York Attorney General holds ADA applies to Web Businesses. Jim Thatcher
• RE: New York Attorney General holds ADA applies to Web Businesses. Jim Thatcher

Friday, 20 August 2004

• Surprise? Re: NY Attorney General holds ADA ... Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: New York Attorney General holds ADA applies to Web Businesses. Jim Tobias
• RE: New York Attorney General holds ADA applies to Web Businesses. Jim Tobias
• RE: New York Attorney General holds ADA applies to Web Businesses. Jim Tobias
• Re: New York Attorney General holds ADA applies to Web Businesses. david poehlman
• RE: New York Attorney General holds ADA applies to Web Businesses. Jim Thatcher
• RE: Is there a case for News as accessible technology? Michael R. Burks
• Re: Is there a case for News as accessible technology? david poehlman
• RE: Is there a case for News as accessible technology? Al Gilman
• Re: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: PDF in WCAG 2 david poehlman
• Re: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Kassia Krozser
• RE: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0) Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com
• Re: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0) Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0) Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com
• Re: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com
• RE: Is there a case for News as accessible technology? Michael R. Burks
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 Joe Clark
• Is there a case for News as accessible technology? Al Gilman
• RE: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0) Lois Wakeman
• RE: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0) Mark Gristock
• RE: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0) PRESTON Scott
• RE: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0) John M Slatin
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 david poehlman
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 Patrick Lauke
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com
• RE: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0) RUST Randal
• re: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0) Lois Wakeman
• RE: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0) David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk

Thursday, 19 August 2004

• Re: Official lines Re: Using em or percent for properties that need to change Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Access Systems
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Access Systems
• FW: New York Attorney General holds ADA applies to Web Businesses. Michael R. Burks
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 david poehlman
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 david poehlman
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Phill Jenkins
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Joe Clark
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 david poehlman
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Phill Jenkins
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 RUST Randal
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 david poehlman
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 RUST Randal
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 RUST Randal
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 Access Systems
• RE: Using em or percent for properties that need to change Joe Clark
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 John M Slatin
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 david poehlman
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Access Systems
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 Phill Jenkins
• RE: Using em or percent for properties that need to change John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Phill Jenkins
• RE: media:Fw: web access case settled in ny Access Systems
• New York Attorney General holds ADA applies to Web Businesses. Jim Thatcher
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: media:Fw: web access case settled in ny Patrick Lauke
• media:Fw: web access case settled in ny david poehlman
• RE: Using em or percent for properties that need to change John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: Using em or percent for properties that need to change (fwd) Laura Carlson
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 RUST Randal
• RE: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0) Access Systems
• Re: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0) david poehlman
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 david poehlman
• RE: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0) RUST Randal
• RE: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0) John M Slatin
• RE: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0) RUST Randal
• Re: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0) david poehlman
• RE: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0) RUST Randal
• RE: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0) Patrick Lauke
• The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0) RUST Randal
• RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0 Patrick Lauke
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 RUST Randal
• RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0 RUST Randal
• CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0 Jesper Tverskov
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Access Systems

Wednesday, 18 August 2004

• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 david poehlman
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Joe Clark
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 Access Systems
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 Joe Clark
• Re: WCAG 2.0, a joke or for real? James Craig
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Access Systems
• Re: Using em or percent for properties that need to change Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 Access Systems
• Re: Validation in WCAG 2 Kerstin Goldsmith
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 Joe Clark
• RE: Using em or percent for properties that need to change Joe Clark
• Questions about WCAG2 Morris, Brent
• Re: Validation in WCAG 2 Joe Clark
• 2.1 operable with keyboard (was: Request for review) Phill Jenkins
• Request for feedback on Working Draft of Gateway to Techniques John M Slatin
• RE: Validation in WCAG 2 Patrick Lauke
• Re: Official lines Re: Using em or percent for properties that need to change Andy Budd
• Re: Validation in WCAG 2 David Dorward
• Re: PDF in WCAG 2 Jesper Tverskov
• Re: Validation in WCAG 2 Jesper Tverskov
• Re: Using em or percent for properties that need to change Andy Budd
• RE: Watered-down Content And Guidelines 2.0 Harry Loots
• Re: Validation in WCAG 2 david poehlman
• Re: Validation in WCAG 2 David Dorward
• Re: Validation in WCAG 2 Tina Holmboe
• Re: Validation in WCAG 2 Alastair Campbell
• Validation in WCAG 2 Jesper Tverskov
• Re: Request for review Lynn Alford

Tuesday, 17 August 2004

• Re: Using em or percent for properties that need to change Lynn Alford
• Request for review Andy Budd
• Press Conference to Announce AIR-Austin 2004 Phill Jenkins
• Comments to WCAG 2.0 Mailing List Phill Jenkins
• Official lines Re: Using em or percent for properties that need to change Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: FW: Using em or percent for properties that need to change Alastair Campbell
• Re: Using em for layout Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Using em or percent for properties that need to change Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Watered-down Content And Guidelines 2.0 Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com
• Watered-down Content And Guidelines 2.0 Harry Loots
• FW: Using em or percent for properties that need to change John Foliot - WATS.ca
• RE: Using em or percent for properties that need to change John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Using em for layout Alastair Campbell
• Re: Using em or percent for properties that need to change Andy Budd
• Re: Using em or percent for properties that need to change Tina Holmboe
• RE: Using em or percent for properties that need to change Patrick Lauke
• RE: Using em or percent for properties that need to change Derek Featherstone
• Re: Using em or percent for properties that need to change Tina Holmboe
• RE: Request for review Patrick Lauke
• Re: Using em or percent for properties that need to change Andy Budd
• RE: Using em or percent for properties that need to change Patrick Lauke
• Request for review Andy Budd
• Using em or percent for properties that need to change Andy Budd
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 Access Systems
• Re: Hello Jon
• Protected message Jon
• RE: Incoming Msg Jon
• RE: PDF in WCAG 2 Patrick Lauke
• PDF in WCAG 2 Jesper Tverskov
• Re: Thanks :) Jon

Monday, 16 August 2004

• Re: Font-size in WCAG 2 Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: WCAG 2.0, a joke or for real? Joe Clark
• RE: Font-size in WCAG 2 Jim Tobias
• Font-size in WCAG 2 Jesper Tverskov

Friday, 13 August 2004

• Re: WCAG 2.0, a joke or for real? James Craig
• WCAG 2.0, a joke or for real? Jesper Tverskov

Thursday, 12 August 2004

• Re: xml.gov Patrick H. Lauke

Wednesday, 11 August 2004

• xml.gov William R Williams

Monday, 9 August 2004

• Request for review: Working Draft of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Wendy A Chisholm
• Fw: European Flash Conference Barcelona 2004 david poehlman
• Fw: MIT job posting -- web accessibility david poehlman

Friday, 6 August 2004

• Breadcrumbs John Britsios
• RE: Usability studies Re: Breadcrumbs Lois Wakeman
• Re: Usability studies Re: Breadcrumbs david poehlman
• Re: Breadcrumbs david poehlman
• RE: Breadcrumbs John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: Breadcrumbs Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Breadcrumbs ben.darlow@dyslexic.com
• Re: Usability studies Re: Breadcrumbs Jesper Tverskov
• Re: Usability studies Re: Breadcrumbs Harry Loots
• 10 grand for an accessible design... Charles McCathieNevile

Thursday, 5 August 2004

• Re: Usability studies Re: Breadcrumbs Phill Jenkins
• Re: CSS generated content Phill Jenkins
• Re: Icons vs. Menus Andy J.W.Affleck
• Work when CSS turned off Re: Breadcrumbs Charles McCathieNevile
• Usability studies Re: Breadcrumbs Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Breadcrumbs Joe Clark

Wednesday, 4 August 2004

• Re: Breadcrumbs Phill Jenkins
• Re: Breadcrumbs Jon Gunderson
• Re: Breadcrumbs david poehlman
• Re: Breadcrumbs david poehlman
• Re: Breadcrumbs Phill Jenkins
• RE: Breadcrumbs Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com
• Re: Breadcrumbs david poehlman
• Re: Breadcrumbs david poehlman
• RE: Breadcrumbs carl.myhill@ps.ge.com
• Re: Breadcrumbs Jon Gunderson
• Re: Breadcrumbs david poehlman
• Re: Breadcrumbs david poehlman
• Re: Breadcrumbs Phill Jenkins
• Re: Breadcrumbs Phill Jenkins
• RE: Breadcrumbs Jon Hanna
• RE: Breadcrumbs carl.myhill@ps.ge.com
• RE: Breadcrumbs John Foliot - WATS.ca
• RE: Breadcrumbs Jon Hanna
• Icons vs. Menus Andy J.W.Affleck
• RE: Breadcrumbs carl.myhill@ps.ge.com
• Re: Breadcrumbs yeliz yesilada
• RE: Breadcrumbs Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com
• Re: Breadcrumbs david poehlman
• Re: link rel/rev (was Re: Breadcrumbs (and some ideas on how to)) Charles McCathieNevile
• link rel/rev (was Re: Breadcrumbs (and some ideas on how to)) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Breadcrumbs (and some ideas on how to) Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Breadcrumbs Dennison, Sharon
• RE: Breadcrumbs carl.myhill@ps.ge.com

Tuesday, 3 August 2004

• Re: Breadcrumbs david poehlman
• Re: Breadcrumbs david poehlman
• Re: Breadcrumbs John Britsios
• Re: Breadcrumbs Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Breadcrumbs Phill Jenkins
• Re: Breadcrumbs Jon Dodd
• Re: Ordered lists and screen reader handling - Re: Breadcrumbs Phill Jenkins
• Re: Breadcrumbs Matt May
• Re: Breadcrumbs Phill Jenkins
• Ordered lists and screen reader handling - Re: Breadcrumbs Isofarro
• Re: Breadcrumbs Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Breadcrumbs Jesper Tverskov
• Re: NVU, child of Mozilla Composer (Windows & Linux) Daniel Glazman

Monday, 2 August 2004

• Re: trusting providers Re: Accessible web content services. Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: trusting providers Re: Accessible web content services. David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk

Sunday, 1 August 2004

• Re: Is ALT text necessary if there's an identical caption adjacent? David Dorward
• Re: Is ALT text necessary if there's an identical caption adjacent? Mordechai Peller

Saturday, 31 July 2004

• trusting providers Re: Accessible web content services. Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 30 July 2004

• Re: Is ALT text necessary if there's an identical caption adjacent? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Is ALT text necessary if there's an identical caption adjacent? Joe Clark
• Re: Table used in place of list Elizabeth J. Pyatt
• Re: Table used in place of list david poehlman
• Re: Table used in place of list Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Is ALT text necessary if there's an identical caption adjacent? David Dorward
• Re: Is ALT text necessary if there's an identical caption adjacent? david poehlman
• Is ALT text necessary if there's an identical caption adjacent? Francois Jordaan
• Re: Table used in place of list David Dorward
• Re: Table used in place of list david poehlman
• Re: Table used in place of list Sailesh Panchang
• RE: Breadcrumbs Patrick Lauke
• Re: Breadcrumbs Isofarro
• RE: Standards compliant webdesign John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Breadcrumbs Hoare, Tim
• RE: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Accessible web content services. Patrick Lauke
• Re: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Accessible web content services. Jon Hanna
• Standards compliant webdesign Jesper Tverskov
• RE: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Accessible web content services. David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk
• RE: Accessible web content services. David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk
• Re: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Accessible web content services. Charles McCathieNevile

Thursday, 29 July 2004

• Re: Table used in place of list Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 30 July 2004

• Re: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Accessible web content services. Patrick H. Lauke

Thursday, 29 July 2004

• Re: Accessible web content services. Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Accessible web content services William R Williams
• Re: Accessible web content services Tina Holmboe
• RE: Accessible web content services Jim Thatcher
• Re: Accessible web content services. Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Table used in place of list William R Williams
• Re: Accessible web content services. Jon Hanna
• Re: Accessible web content services William R Williams
• Re: Accessible web content services. Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Table used in place of list Elizabeth J. Pyatt
• Re: Question re. div element Jon Hanna
• Question re. div element Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Table used in place of list david poehlman
• Table used in place of list Sailesh Panchang
• RE: Clarification: RE: Accessible web content services. Jon Dodd
• RE: Clarification: RE: Accessible web content services. John Foliot - WATS.ca
• RE: Clarification: RE: Accessible web content services. Jon Dodd
• Re: Clarification: RE: Accessible web content services. Tina Holmboe
• Re: Accessible web content services Tina Holmboe
• Clarification: RE: Accessible web content services. John Foliot - WATS.ca
• RE: Accessible web content services. John Foliot - WATS.ca
• RE: Accessible web content services Jim Thatcher
• Re: Accessible web content services. david poehlman
• Re: Accessible web content services Ineke van der Maat
• RE: Accessible web content services. David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk
• Finding experts Re: Accessible web content services. Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Accessible web content services. Christophe Strobbe
• Re: XML incremental rendering, was Re: Standards mode and Quirks mode (was Re: [CSS21] Test Suite) David Woolley

Wednesday, 28 July 2004

• Re: Accessible web content services. Tina Holmboe
• Re: Accessible web content services. david poehlman
• RE: Accessible web content services. Cheryl D Wise
• Invitation: W3C DIWG Workshop on Metadata for Content Adaptation Rotan Hanrahan
• Re: Accessible web content services. Tina Holmboe
• RE: Accessible web content services. Cheryl D Wise
• Re: Accessible web content services. david poehlman
• RE: Accessible web content services. Jim Thatcher
• RE: Accessible web content services. Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com
• Re: Accessible web content services. Tina Holmboe
• Re: Accessible web content services. david poehlman
• Accessible web content services. David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk
• Re: Accessibility of Java Applets Christophe Strobbe

Tuesday, 27 July 2004

• Re: XML incremental rendering, was Re: Standards mode and Quirks mode (was Re: [CSS21] Test Suite) David Woolley
• Re: Accessibility of Pages Requiring Sign-In Matthew Smith
• [w3c-wai-ig] <none> George Kerscher
• Re: Accessibility of Java Applets Matt May
• Re: Accessibility of Java Applets David Woolley
• Re: Accessibility of Pages Requiring Sign-In David Woolley
• RE: Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser Access Systems
• RE: Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: Accessibility of Pages Requiring Sign-In Jon Hanna
• Re: Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser Access Systems
• Accessibility of Java Applets RUST Randal
• Re: Accessibility of Pages Requiring Sign-In Samuel Rinnetmäki
• RE: Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser Tina Holmboe
• Re: Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser David Dorward
• Re: Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser Jesper Tverskov
• Re: Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser David Dorward
• RE: Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser Lois Wakeman
• Re: Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser Jesper Tverskov
• Re: Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser David Dorward
• Re: Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser Jesper Tverskov
• RE: Accessibility of Pages Requiring Sign-In Claire Agnew
• Re: Accessibility of Pages Requiring Sign-In Charles McCathieNevile
• Accessibility of Pages Requiring Sign-In Matthew Smith

Sunday, 25 July 2004

• good samaritan website hack... dean colby

Friday, 23 July 2004

• JavaScripts to hide and show content Joe Clark
• Re: Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser David Woolley
• Re: Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser David Woolley
• Press Release: MathPlayer Neil Soiffer
• multiple versions Re: Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser Patrick Lauke
• Re: Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser Charles McCathieNevile

Thursday, 22 July 2004

• URIs Re: The Age newspaper website Charles McCathieNevile
• The Age newspaper website Charles McCathieNevile

Wednesday, 21 July 2004

• Media: IBM Tool Has An Eye For The Blind david poehlman
• Re: Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser Jesper Tverskov

Tuesday, 20 July 2004

• Re: Security vs accessibility? Charles McCathieNevile
• Fw: [webwatch] Wired: Changing the Face of Web Surfing david poehlman
• In the News: DIY Accessibility Re-builds Matthew Smith
• Re: is LiveSearch accessible? Access Systems
• Re: is LiveSearch accessible? Jim Ley
• Web Accessibility/HTML Standards in 4 EU States Barry McMullin
• RE: is LiveSearch accessible? Morris, Brent
• Re: Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: is LiveSearch accessible? Access Systems
• Re: is LiveSearch accessible? Access Systems
• Re: is LiveSearch accessible? Access Systems
• RE: is LiveSearch accessible? Morris, Brent
• is LiveSearch accessible? Morris, Brent
• Re: Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser Jon Hanna
• Re: Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser david poehlman
• (no subject) Danalouise
• Should pdf and doc open alone or inside the browser Jesper Tverskov
• (no subject) Danalouise

Monday, 19 July 2004

• Two articles from First Monday Joe Clark
• (no subject) Mburks
• Standards for Including Computer Screen Shots ? Tipton, William
• Fw: (Please read) Security vs accessibility? david poehlman
• RE: Security vs accessibility? Access Systems
• RE: Security vs accessibility? Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com

Sunday, 18 July 2004

• Re: Security vs accessibility? Access Systems
• Security vs accessibility? david poehlman

Thursday, 15 July 2004

• RE: Text editor for CMS Mark Gristock
• ATutor 1.4.1 Released info@atutor.ca
• Re: Text editor for CMS Julian Voelcker

Wednesday, 14 July 2004

• Re: Text editor for CMS James Craig
• RE: Text editor for CMS Little, James
• RE: Text editor for CMS Patrick Lauke
• Text editor for CMS Mark Gristock

Tuesday, 13 July 2004

• RE: web survey tool recommendations? Stephani Roberts Lincoln
• mathML Helder Ferreira
• mathML support... Charles McCathieNevile
• Displaying glossaries Joe Clark

Monday, 12 July 2004

• RE: HIVE? Geoff Deering
• RE: HIVE? Udas, Ken
• Re: HIVE? Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: HIVE? [Morpheum] Matthew Harris
• RE: web survey tool recommendations? Udas, Ken
• RE: HIVE? Udas, Ken
• HIVE? Geoff Deering
• Re: web survey tool recommendations? James Craig
• Re: Media: PDF tagging for the blind david poehlman
• Re: Media: PDF tagging for the blind David Woolley
• Re: Media: PDF tagging for the blind Patrick H. Lauke
• Media: PDF tagging for the blind david poehlman

Sunday, 11 July 2004

• Re: web survey tool recommendations? Helder Ferreira
• RE: web survey tool recommendations? Udas, Ken

Wednesday, 7 July 2004

• web survey tool recommendations? James Craig

Monday, 5 July 2004

• Re: Filtering Default Text in Forms Isofarro
• Re: Filtering Default Text in Forms Matthew Smith
• Re: Filtering Default Text in Forms David Woolley
• Re: Filtering Default Text in Forms david poehlman
• Filtering Default Text in Forms Matthew Smith

Sunday, 4 July 2004

• Re: Automatic Refresh David Woolley
• Re: Automatic Refresh Patrick H. Lauke

Saturday, 3 July 2004

• Automatic Refresh Matthew Smith
• Re: search engine provides accessibility ratings: Access Systems
• search engine provides accessibility ratings: david poehlman

Thursday, 1 July 2004

• RE: Incoming Msg Jon
• Re: Accessibility of Post vs Get Pages Jon Hanna
• Re: Accessibility of Post vs Get Pages David Woolley

Last message date: Thursday, 30 September 2004 10:59:53 UTC