- From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.ac.be>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:32:11 +0200
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hi, At 21:14 28/07/2004, Tina Holmboe wrote: >(...) > The GAWDS state as one of > their goals: > > "To promote the use of web standards and encourage their adoption." > > For creating accessible websides we have a standard; or as close as > one as makes no practical difference: WCAG 1.0. Selecting which bits > and pieces to use based on a local idea of "where appropriate" is > fine; but then the standard isn't followed. We do not only need a standard such as WCAG, we also need harmonisation of the methods used to evaluate Web accessibility. > Hard-headed and inflexible ? No, not really. GAWDS are free to take > whichever pieces of the WCAG they wish and apply those to their site; > but perhaps they then shouldn't work for standards adoption. > > This all said, what bothers me more is what I found on > http://www.gawds.org/show.php?contentid=58 > > The need for a trusted "root" is still present. I think setting up such an organisation is one of the eams of the SUPPORT-EAM project of the EuroAccessibility consortium. On <http://www.euroaccessibility.org/project_summary.php>, they state as one of their goals: "Setting up an European Authority and accredited regional helpdesks in Europe, in co-operation with the EdeAN network." On of their other goals is "Harmonising of the methodologies for evaluating Web Accessibility (single-site or large-scale)". As far as I know, the project starts in September or October, so they can't yet provide a list of "reputable" people. Regards, Christophe >(...) >-- > - Tina Holmboe Greytower Technologies > tina@greytower.net http://www.greytower.net/ > [+46] 0708 557 905 -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2004 03:48:12 UTC