- From: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:44:36 -0500
- To: "david poehlman" <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 19 August 2004 18:45:11 UTC
>I beg to differ with the statement that the wcag is about the content and >not the file format or perhaps , they should be. Well, maybe we'll have to agree to disagree on this one. If we were talking about SVG instead of PDF would the conversation be any different? Are there enough assistive technologies that support SVG? Does SVG run in Lynx? SVG is what I loosely consider the W3C version of PDF. and by the way SVG is specifically listed in WCAG 2.0 But the point is that the SVG author still needs to make the content follow the principles in WCAG 2.0. Regards, Phill
Received on Thursday, 19 August 2004 18:45:11 UTC