- From: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 15:31:29 -0400
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Cc: <webaim-forum-d@list.webaim.org>
- Message-ID: <008101c48947$cadfe290$3d01a8c0@deque.local>
Phil wrote: "In this New York case, it seems that the policy under which the complaint was filed was the ADA, but I'm confused why the 508 Web standard wasn't chosen or cited as the standard since it is also a Federal policy like the ADA." "Does the State of New York or New Jersey actually specify WCAG 1.0, or was that just used by AGO? So if I incorporate in a state that uses the 508 web standards, am I held to those guidelines, or if I incorporate in a state that uses the WCAG 1.0 standards, am I held to those standards? Can I pick which state (or country) I choose to operate under? Can I pick which standard (or level a double A, or triple AAA) I choose to follow?" Sailesh: Arguably private businesses are covered by Title III of the ADA as they are public accommodations. Sec 508 applies to electronic and IT purchases / acquisition by the feds and does not apply to cases like these. State gov policies too apply to state agencies only and different states have different policies. See (1) . As per this doc, New York apparent policy is "planning and procurement that will ensure equal access to electronic and information technology". In applying the general " should be accessible to PWD" principle, the NY-AGO chose to follow the WCAG 1.0 . Yet in Priceline's case it is interesting to note that it prescribed a skip nav link which maps more closely to Sec 508 para O than to checkpoint 13.6 which is P3. *1. http://www.ilru.org/online/handouts/2003/Brown2/Information_Technology.html Sailesh Panchang Senior Accessibility Engineer Deque Systems,11180 Sunrise Valley Drive, 4th Floor, Reston VA 20191 Tel: 703-225-0380 Extension 105 E-mail: sailesh.panchang@deque.com Fax: 703-225-0387 * Look up <http://www.deque.com> *
Received on Monday, 23 August 2004 19:32:23 UTC