- From: John Foliot - WATS.ca <foliot@wats.ca>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 09:54:49 -0400
- To: "'Mike Brown'" <mike@signify.co.nz>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Mike Brown wrote: > Is the "reading age" of a site, assuming it can be measured, > an accessibility issue? Is there a limit to how far > information can be "simplified" before it loses its usefulness? > Mike, Readability is most certainly an access / accessibility issue. In the many seminars and presentations we deliver, we always remind the audience that there are numerous types of accessibility issues, which can be broken down into 4 basic groups: visual, auditory, mobility and (the hardest of all) cognitive. Cognitive issues can be as severe as Downs Syndrome or other severe learning conditions (see Jonathan Chetwynd's Peepo site for ideas and attempts to connect to this community - http://www.peepo.com/help.html [1]), to less invasive or restricting issues such as Dyslexia, users who's mother tongue is not that of the site, age or literacy levels, etc. Readability can be measured (to an extent) using any number of algorithms or indexes, the most well-known being the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Score (see our site: http://wats.ca/resources/determiningreadability/1). However, as you suggest, the issue becomes one of providing appropriate yet useful information targeted to the appropriate audience; "dumbing down" the content below a certain level impacts on a site's usefulness just as severely as a site that is too complex. Large web sites, especially those with broad or mass appeal are always well advised to employ an actual editor (of the human kind <grin>) to review content and content language to ensure that the "message" is properly crafted to the their readers. Cheers! JF -- John Foliot foliot@wats.ca Web Accessibility Specialist / Co-founder of WATS.ca Web Accessibility Testing and Services http://www.wats.ca 1.866.932.4878 (North America) [1] Although I often disagree with Jonathan's methodology and use of non-standard authoring techniques, many which contravene the letter and occasionally the spirit of *my reading* of the WCAG, his efforts to connect to a specific, disadvantaged community far outweighs these issues, and I commend him for his efforts and contributions.
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2004 13:54:59 UTC