- From: david poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:08:57 -0400
- To: "Juan Ulloa" <julloa@bcc.ctc.edu>, "wai-ig list" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
no, a sighted user can see and feel braille, there is nothing that a blind user can do about images on the web. Johnnie Apple Seed ----- Original Message ----- From: "Juan Ulloa" <julloa@bcc.ctc.edu> To: "wai-ig list" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 10:38 AM Subject: RE: the ramp to nowhere: David Poehlman said: > So, if braille is inaccessible > to the sighted, than, it follows that a site that is unusable to a blind > person using assistive technology even though it is coded with all > accessibility techniques in play leaving out all the checks that cannot > be > done automatically is also inaccessible since as with the braille, the > sighted can read it with their eyes and even with their fingers if they > are > capable of doing so and the assistive technology user can access all the > information on the web page, it's just not meaningfull or usefull which > gives her the feeling that it is not accessible. That depends; is there Braille reading software that can read the content to a sighted user? So, in that sense, Braille text is *inaccessible* to a sighted user the same way an image containing text is *inaccessible* to a blind user. The point is moot. Juan
Received on Thursday, 26 August 2004 15:08:17 UTC