- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 03:08:35 +0100
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles McCathieNevile" [snip] > <link rev="section" href="myparent" title="immmediate parent document > of this one" /> > <link rev="subsection" href="myGparent" title="grandparent document > of this one" /> > <link rel="start" href="home" title="home page for this breadcrumb > trail" /> This is probably taking the discussion outside of the realm of accessibility, and more into the area of interpretation of standards (and if that's the case I apologise, and I promise to promptly shut up), but: shouldn't the first two links be rel rather than rev? If I understand the spec http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/links.html#h-12.1.2 correctly, rel defines how the linked document relates to the current one, while rev defines how the current document relates to the linked one. Patrick (and yes, I do have a life outside of divining meaning out of the often cryptic words of the w3c specifications, in spite of my nitpickings of late on this list)
Received on Tuesday, 3 August 2004 22:08:56 UTC