- From: Kerstin Goldsmith <kerstin.goldsmith@oracle.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:37:28 -0700
- To: "Elizabeth J. Pyatt" <ejp10@psu.edu>
- CC: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
yes, null alt's allow screenreader to skip over decorative graphics. by the same token, if a standard approach were taken for tables simply being used to layout information on a webpage, screenreaders would know not to look for/read associative information. as sailesh also pointed out, empty attributes allow for automated testing. although, in our tool, we allow for both empty attributes like summary and alt, as well as certain key phrases, like summary="layout", summary="layout table", etc.. these values being filled, however, does not help the screenreader user. -kerstin Elizabeth J. Pyatt wrote: > > I thought one of the purposes of the empty alt="" or alt=" " was to > provide a dummy tag so the screen reader didn't keep announcing IMAGE > all the time. If this is incorrect, then somebody please correct me. > > I agree that other empty tags (e.g. summary="") are probably redundant. > > Thanks > > Elizabeth
Received on Friday, 27 August 2004 19:38:49 UTC