- From: Isofarro <lists@isofarro.uklinux.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:50:29 +0100
- To: jim@jimthatcher.com
- CC: 'W3c-Wai-Ig' <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Jim Thatcher wrote: > I was surprised to see no replies on this important announcement. Basically > the Attorney General of New York is holding that the ADA applies to web > sites as "places of public accommodations." This is good news indeed. Eliot Spitzer is visible in Internet circles as the Attorney suing Scott Richter - the optinrealbig spammer (or is that "high-volume email marketer"). Certainly Spitzer seems to have a better grasp of the nature of the Web, and that can only be a good thing. Even better when he gets results you've mentioned above. However, if I am reading this right, Priceline and Ramada have reached a settlement with Spitzer, part of which is to make their websites accessible. No ruling has been made here as to ADA's applicability to websites - nothing as concrete as Martin v MARTA, and Access Now v Southwestern Airlines. As I understand it from the online press articles, the settlement agreement to make their websites accessible isn't based on the acceptance of wrong-doing. Without doubt, this is certainly some positive news. Considering the other ADA-related decisions over the past few months (for instance the landmark decision that accessibility applies to the justice/legal system so courthouses have to be accessible), the overall trend has been toward applying ADA to these scenarios. This is going a long way to undoing the damage of the Southwest airlines verdict - but not yet a complete reversal just yet. Which reminds me, did anything come out of the appeal on the Southwestern ruling? Mike.
Received on Monday, 23 August 2004 16:49:35 UTC