- From: John Foliot - WATS.ca <foliot@wats.ca>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:19:26 -0400
- To: "'Andy Budd'" <andy@message.uk.com>, "'W'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> > I've discussed this issue on various accessibility, usability and web > design forums/mailing lists and all I get is personal bias. What I'm > interested in is hearing what the official WAI line is. > Andy, There is no "official" line. The WAI guidelines are guidelines, plain and simple. However, methinks that you are arguing for a point of view, which is being rebutted from all corners. Let's take it back to basics: HTML for content, CSS for presentation. If you truly separate the two, you will be going a long way in providing accessible content. But, by the same token, if you start to ham-string your CSS with fixed values, etc., then "in my opinion" you are stepping backwards, not forwards. The initially envisioned idea for HTML was to allow the user agent to format the content and "display" the information to the end user in the way that the end user was accustomed to receiving text based information. Semantic markup was the key. Then along came the designers with their Photoshop(tm) visions and nearly broke the web with tables based layouts and kludges and hacks... We all know the history. Then the backlash, the emergence of Standards Evangelists (Zeldman anybody?), and a closer look at how we were achieving things. Now, we have developers/designers who are trying to achieve both visual display and semantic markup. Good! But the accessibility argument/advocates will argue that, given a "draw" or area of ambiguity, better to ere on the side of accessibility. Yes, this is opinion, but opinion based upon experience, understanding, perhaps personal knowledge and/or perspective. BUT THE ARE NO STANDARDS. So if you want to do something, and feel that you can justify it from an accessibility perspective and you want to claim AAA compliance, there is really no one person or organization which can refute or condemn your opinion, as it is just that, opinion. However, if you choose to ignore the suggestions, opinions and perspectives of the majority of people who actively involve themselves in this arena, don't be surprised if you will get debate. Much of it will appear to you to be subjective or biased, but that's the nature of the Guidelines... They open themselves to interpretation. At the same time, there does appear to be an emerging consensus on a number of issues; should you choose to ignore that consensus you *may* find it harder and harder to claim conformance and be able to defend it, as the body of consensus will be "agin ya" Rambling thoughts and opinions all. JF -- John Foliot foliot@wats.ca Web Accessibility Specialist / Co-founder of WATS.ca Web Accessibility Testing and Services http://www.wats.ca 1.866.932.4878 (North America)
Received on Tuesday, 17 August 2004 16:19:32 UTC