- From: david poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:32:50 -0400
- To: <cdwise@wiserways.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Surely, for the fact that following the access key spec is a bad idea in many respects for it is broken and it does a lot of conflicting, but I know of no application today that supports the intent of access keys such as go to the table of contents, actiavte a particular link etc. I have seen access keys implemented well though but ufortunately, with ie and many assistive technologies, they don't work even when they are well implemented. It is always appropriate to follow wai guidelines if you want to state conformance. People don't have to use the access keys if they cause problems, but putting them in the code does not cause any harm. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cheryl D Wise" <cdwise@wiserways.com> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:16 PM Subject: RE: Accessible web content services. From: Tina Holmboe >> GAWS was, however, an interesting link to have. I would like to understand their position on "Following WAI recommendations where appropriate" though. << I don't presume to speak for the organization but my personal take is that some of the recommendations such as Access Keys may or may not be a good recommendation to follow. That is an area of considerable debate, which ones are available that don't conflict with operating system, browser, accessibility device/programs already assigned keys. No set of "standard" available keys that can be relied upon, etc. all make following that recommendation less than an ideal situation. Cheryl D. Wise Certified Professional Web Developer MS-MVP-FrontPage www.wiserways.com mailto: cdwise@wiserways.com 713.353.0139 Office
Received on Wednesday, 28 July 2004 14:32:37 UTC