RE: PDF in WCAG 2

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Joe Clark wrote:

> >That final analysis rests with you, and in my mind it's quite
> >simple: if you want to be able to claim compliance with WCAG1.0, you
> >need to address the issue of PDFs.
>
> It's been addressed. A wide variety of PDFs can be made adequately
> accessible to many groups. Time has marched on.

please explain how I should make my pdf's readable

I'm running Red Hat Linux 9
browsing using Lynx
and screen reader is emacspeak

> >Maybe I'm over-interpreting, but: I would class PDFs as non-text content
> Except for all that text inside them.

no it is not, it is essentially a photograph of the text but it is not
text

Bob

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
CONFIGURE YOUR E-MAIL TO SEND TEXT ONLY, see http://expita.com/nomime.html
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve Neither liberty nor safety",    Benjamin Franklin
-   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -
   ASCII Ribbon Campaign                        accessBob
    NO HTML/PDF/RTF in e-mail                   accessys@smartnospam.net
    NO MSWord docs in e-mail                    Access Systems, engineers
    NO attachments in e-mail,  *LINUX powered*   access is a civil right
*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
THIS message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
privileged.  They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named

Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2004 18:04:42 UTC