- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 02:43:35 +0300
- To: jim@jimthatcher.com, "'W3c-Wai-Ig'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I'm not sure why it is a big surprise. There is not a lot of case law in this area, but there is some, and the general trend appears to be that laws meant for bricks and mortar businesses (becasue that's what was around when they happened to be written) apply to internet-based businesses too. Naturally there are exceptions to this line of interpretation (one of them occasioned howls of protest on this and other accessibility fora about a year ago). On the other hand, while the legal landscape in which accessibility happens is important to know about, this is not a list filled with lawyers, law makers, or people otherwise in a position to do much more than note the fact and get on with their jobs. It is clearly potentially interesting, but I don't see anything obvious to discuss (beyond basic questions like "is the article accurate? Where do I find the rulings? Does this have legal implications in the province of Saskatoon?" which aren't always the main interests of list participants). It is a bit like an announcement that the browser w3m supports CSS. It might lead to discussions about how to use it, or it might not. But to a large extent it would be one of the interesting things that make up the landscape. just my 2 cents worth. Bear in mind that I don't live or work in New York... cheers Chaals On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 18:07:08 -0500, Jim Thatcher <jim@jimthatcher.com> wrote: > > I was surprised to see no replies on this important announcement. > Basically > the Attorney General of New York is holding that the ADA applies to web > sites as "places of public accommodations." -- Charles McCathieNevile charles@sidar.org FundaciĆ³n Sidar http://www.sidar.org
Received on Saturday, 21 August 2004 00:44:16 UTC