Re: possible alternative to css hiding with display:none etc

Rebecca Cox wrote in the first instance:
>>I still often see (and get asked to implement) content "hidden" from
>>screen display with CSS, that is meant to provide some sort of extra
>>information to users of text/speech browsers.

David Wooley replied:
> Note that as these techniques make the content accessible to search
> engine indexers, but not to "normal" users, they are all likely to
> be abused to stuff keywords and therefore result in low search engine
> rankings.

Matthew Smith responds:

Are we saying that even a "skip navigation" link as per the WCAG2 technique that 
Rebecca mentions* would be liable to drive a page down in search engine rankings?

If so, this would constitute an accessibility technique reducing the 
accessibility of a page because is not being able to find a page a part of its 
overall accessibility?

Cheers

M

*<http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-WCAG20-HTML-TECHS-20040730/#linkgroups_hide>

-- 
Matthew Smith
Kadina Business Consultancy
South Australia

Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2004 06:31:52 UTC