public-ws-addressing@w3.org from November 2004 by author

Anish Karmarkar

• WD CHANGE (Monday, 22 November)
• i023: Requried properties in EPR -- email to kick off the discussion (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: Composibility problems with refps (Monday, 22 November)
• i034: scope of action defaults (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: Composibility problems with refps (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: i003: WSDL 1.1/2.0 MEPs. Initial proposal (long) (Monday, 15 November)
• Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Monday, 15 November)
• i017: Purpose of Action property (Monday, 15 November)
• Composibility problems with refps (Monday, 15 November)
• AI: why Service QName is required if client has WSDL + engaged in conversation? (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Issue 012: EPR Lifetime (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Issue 011 (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Issue 011 (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Issue 011 (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: Issue 011 (Wednesday, 3 November)

Ashok Malhotra

• RE: get metadata (was RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Wednesday, 3 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Wednesday, 3 November)
• RE: Action item: embedded policy requirements/use case (Wednesday, 3 November)

Bergersen, Rebecca

• RE: NEW Issue - Reference to WSDL definition in an EPR (Thursday, 11 November)
• RE: NEW Issue - Reference to WSDL definition in an EPR (Thursday, 11 November)
• NEW Issue - Reference to WSDL definition in an EPR (Thursday, 11 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 27 - Reference to WSDL definition in an EPR (Tuesday, 9 November)
• WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Thursday, 4 November)
• WS-A Issue 27 - Reference to WSDL definition in an EPR (Thursday, 4 November)

Bob Freund

• Issue 012: Recapitulation and proposal draft 1 (Thursday, 4 November)
• Issue 012: EPR Lifetime (Wednesday, 3 November)

Brinild

• RE: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)
• RE: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports (Wednesday, 10 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Tuesday, 9 November)

Christopher B Ferris

• RE: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Thursday, 25 November)
• RE: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Thursday, 25 November)
• RE: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Thursday, 25 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Thursday, 25 November)
• RE: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Thursday, 25 November)
• RE: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Thursday, 25 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: ISSUE 8 : "Clarity and Safety" (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: Composibility problems with refps (Monday, 22 November)

David Booth

• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Tuesday, 30 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Thursday, 25 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (implementation model) (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (implementation model) (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Friday, 19 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Thursday, 18 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Thursday, 18 November)
• Issue 0001: Use cases for Reference Properties? (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Wednesday, 17 November)

David Orchard

• RE: Agenda: WS-A telcon 2004-11-29 (Sunday, 28 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Scope of message addressing properties (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Replace QName's with anyURI (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: ISSUE 8 : "Clarity and Safety" (Monday, 22 November)
• i001: EPRs as identifiers: Use cases for RefProps/Params (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax [i032] (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Friday, 19 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Friday, 19 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Friday, 19 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Tuesday, 16 November)
• i0031: Making wsa:Action Optional (Monday, 15 November)
• RE: Agenda: WS-A telcon 2004-11-15 (Sunday, 14 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Saturday, 13 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Saturday, 13 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Saturday, 13 November)
• i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Saturday, 13 November)
• RE: New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax [i032] (Friday, 12 November)
• IOR Questions (Monday, 8 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Monday, 8 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Sunday, 7 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Saturday, 6 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Saturday, 6 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Saturday, 6 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• Issue #1: Proposed text and resolution (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: get metadata (was RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 27 - Reference to WSDL definition in an EPR (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: Issue 012: EPR Lifetime (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: EPRs and URIs prezo at F2F (Thursday, 4 November)
• EPRs and URIs prezo at F2F (Wednesday, 3 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Wednesday, 3 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Wednesday, 3 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Wednesday, 3 November)
• RE: Issue 011 (Tuesday, 2 November)
• RE: Issue 011 (Tuesday, 2 November)

Doug Davis

• Re: i029 Disallowing Faults (Thursday, 11 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Saturday, 6 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Wednesday, 3 November)
• WS-Addr issues (Wednesday, 3 November)

Francisco Curbera

• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: ISSUE 8 : "Clarity and Safety" (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Saturday, 13 November)
• Re: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)
• RE: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Issue 012: Recapitulation and proposal draft 1 (Tuesday, 9 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: making wsa:Action optional (Sunday, 7 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Sunday, 7 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Sunday, 7 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Sunday, 7 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Sunday, 7 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• Action item: embedded policy requirements/use case (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: Issue 012: EPR Lifetime (Wednesday, 3 November)

Garfield Green

• WS-Reliability specification submitted for OASIS Standard (Monday, 15 November)

George Datuashvili

• RE: ISSUE 8 : "Clarity and Safety" (Tuesday, 9 November)

Glen Daniels

• RE: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Monday, 29 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Issue numbers (Monday, 15 November)
• i0016: Distinguishing RefProperty headers (Monday, 15 November)
• i0018: Protocol-specific markup in RefP's (Monday, 15 November)
• ISSUE 8 : "Clarity and Safety" (Tuesday, 9 November)
• RE: Issue 011 (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: Issue 011 (Tuesday, 2 November)

Greg Truty

• Fw: Issue 011 (Wednesday, 3 November)

Harm Smit

• RE: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)

Harris Reynolds

• i029 Disallowing Faults (Thursday, 11 November)
• Issue 011 (Tuesday, 2 November)

Hugo Haas

• Re: Agenda: WS-A telcon 2004-11-29 (Monday, 29 November)
• NEW ISSUE: Spec name versioning (editorial) (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Issue i021 detailed proposal (was Re: Issue 021: WSDL Extension for Addressing) (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Issues i034: Action defaults (was Re: Issue 019: WSDL Version Neutrality) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: ISSUE 8 : "Clarity and Safety" (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: ISSUE 8 : "Clarity and Safety" (Friday, 19 November)
• I034: Re: Issue 019: WSDL Version Neutrality (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: i034: computing default Action value for WSDL 2.0 (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: Issue 019: WSDL Version Neutrality (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: Issue 019: WSDL Version Neutrality (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: i003: WSDL 1.1/2.0 MEPs. Initial proposal (long) (Monday, 15 November)
• Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Monday, 15 November)
• Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Monday, 15 November)
• Re: Issue 019: WSDL Version Neutrality (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Issue 019: WSDL Version Neutrality (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: Issue 021: WSDL Extension for Addressing (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: Issue 021: WSDL Extension for Addressing (Friday, 5 November)
• Minutes of the 2004-11-03 teleconference (Friday, 5 November)
• Minutes of the NYC F2F (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Issue 021: WSDL Extension for Addressing (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Implication of the publication of the first public Working Draft with regards to the Patent Policy (Tuesday, 2 November)

Jacques Durand

• RE: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (and also i003: ) (Friday, 12 November)
• i028: RE: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)

James Snell

• NEW ISSUE: WS-Addressing MIME Media Type (Monday, 22 November)

Jeff Mischkinsky

• Re: WS-Addr issues (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: Action and scope (was: WS-Addr issues) (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Saturday, 6 November)

Jim Webber

• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Wednesday, 3 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Wednesday, 3 November)

John Fuller

• Re: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Wednesday, 24 November)

Jonathan Marsh

• RE: Issues i034: Action defaults (was Re: Issue 019: WSDL Version Neutrality) (Monday, 29 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax [i032] (Sunday, 21 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Sunday, 21 November)
• RE: i034: computing default Action value for WSDL 2.0 (Thursday, 18 November)
• i034: computing default Action value for WSDL 2.0 (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: ISSUE 8 : "Clarity and Safety" (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: Issue 019: WSDL Version Neutrality (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: Issue 019: WSDL Version Neutrality (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: Issue 019: WSDL Version Neutrality (Monday, 15 November)
• RE: Issue 021: WSDL Extension for Addressing (Monday, 15 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Monday, 8 November)

Marc Hadley

• Re: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: i038: Scope of message addressing properties [i038] (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Securing EPRs (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Wednesday, 24 November)
• NEW ISSUE: Securing EPRs (Wednesday, 24 November)
• NEW ISSUE: Scope of message addressing properties (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: Composibility problems with refps (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Replace QName's with anyURI (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: ISSUE 8 : "Clarity and Safety" (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: Issue 0001: Use cases for Reference Properties? (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: ISSUE 8 : "Clarity and Safety" (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: Issue 019: WSDL Version Neutrality (Wednesday, 17 November)
• NEW ISSUE: Fixed action URI for faults (Monday, 15 November)
• Re: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Thursday, 11 November)
• i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Issue 6 (Message Property Optionality) (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Issue 011 (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: Issue 011 (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: Issue 011 (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: Issue 011 (Wednesday, 3 November)

Mark Baker

• Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Sunday, 28 November)
• Addresses, identifiers, and cookie semantics (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: Composibility problems with refps (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Thursday, 25 November)
• Security and self-description (was Re: Composibility problems with refps (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Sunday, 14 November)
• Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Saturday, 13 November)
• Re: Why FaultTo? (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Why FaultTo? (Thursday, 11 November)
• Why FaultTo? (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: URIs vs EPRs (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Sunday, 7 November)
• URIs vs EPRs (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: Issue #1: Proposed text and resolution (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: get metadata (was RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: get metadata (was RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• get metadata (was RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)

Mark Little

• Re: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: Agenda: WS-A telcon 2004-11-15 (Monday, 15 November)
• Re: Why FaultTo? (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: making wsa:Action optional (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: making wsa:Action optional (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Saturday, 6 November)
• NEW ISSUE: making wsa:Action optional (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: Action and scope (was: WS-Addr issues) (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: NEW ISSUE (Friday, 5 November)
• [public-ws-addressing] <none> (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: NEW ISSUE (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: NEW ISSUE (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• NEW ISSUE (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Issue 012: EPR Lifetime (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)

Mark Nottingham

• Agenda: WS-A telcon 2004-11-29 (Sunday, 28 November)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Securing EPRs (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Replace QName's with anyURI [i037] (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: WS-Addressing MIME Media Type [i036] (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Scope of message addressing properties [i038] (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Spec name versioning (editorial) [i039] (Thursday, 25 November)
• Minutes of the 2004-11-22 teleconference (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Agenda: WS-A telcon 2004-11-22 (Saturday, 20 November)
• Agenda: 2004-12-07 F2F, Redmond, WA US [DRAFT] (Thursday, 18 November)
• Minutes of the 2004-11-15 teleconference (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: Issue 019: WSDL Version Neutrality [i034] (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Fixed action URI for faults [i035] (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: Issue numbers (Monday, 15 November)
• Agenda: WS-A telcon 2004-11-15 (Sunday, 14 November)
• Re: NEW Issue - Reference to WSDL definition in an EPR [i033] (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: NEW Issue - Reference to WSDL definition in an EPR (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax [i032] (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Issues and e-mail discussion (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Minutes of the 2004-11-08 teleconference (Monday, 8 November)
• Agenda: WS-A telcon 2004-11-08 (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: making wsa:Action optional (Sunday, 7 November)
• Action optionality (was: WS-Addr issues) (Friday, 5 November)
• Action and scope (was: WS-Addr issues) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: NEW ISSUE (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Raising issues (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: NEW ISSUE (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• i023 status (Thursday, 4 November)
• Cardinality / Optionality issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Thursday, 4 November)
• Raising issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Issue 012: EPR Lifetime (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Action item: embedded policy requirements/use case (Thursday, 4 November)
• WS-Addressing presentation from the NYC F2F (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Agenda: WS-A WG telcon 2004-11-03 (Tuesday, 2 November)

Mark Peel

• Re: i029 Disallowing Faults (Friday, 12 November)

Martin Gudgin

• RE: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Thursday, 25 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Thursday, 25 November)
• RE: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Thursday, 25 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: ISSUE 8 : "Clarity and Safety" (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: ISSUE 8 : "Clarity and Safety" (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (implementation model) (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: ISSUE 8 : "Clarity and Safety" (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: ISSUE 8 : "Clarity and Safety" (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: Agenda: WS-A telcon 2004-11-15 (Monday, 15 November)
• RE: ISSUE 8 : "Clarity and Safety" (Monday, 15 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Monday, 15 November)
• RE: Issue 012: Recapitulation and proposal draft 1 (Monday, 15 November)
• RE: why Service QName is required if client has WSDL + engaged in conversation? (Monday, 15 November)
• RE: New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax [i032] (Friday, 12 November)
• RE: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)
• RE: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)
• RE: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)
• RE: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)
• RE: Why FaultTo? (Thursday, 11 November)
• i003: WSDL 1.1/2.0 MEPs. Initial proposal (long) (Thursday, 11 November)
• RE: Why FaultTo? (Thursday, 11 November)
• RE: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Thursday, 11 November)
• RE: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Thursday, 11 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Saturday, 6 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Saturday, 6 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Saturday, 6 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Saturday, 6 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Saturday, 6 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Saturday, 6 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Saturday, 6 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Saturday, 6 November)
• RE: Issue 011 (Saturday, 6 November)
• RE: Issue 011 (Saturday, 6 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: Issue 011 (Wednesday, 3 November)
• RE: Issue 011 (Wednesday, 3 November)
• RE: Issue 012: EPR Lifetime (Wednesday, 3 November)
• RE: Issue 011 (Wednesday, 3 November)
• RE: Issue 011 (Wednesday, 3 November)
• RE: Issue 011 (Tuesday, 2 November)
• RE: Issue 011 (Tuesday, 2 November)

michael.eder@nokia.com

• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: Issue 012: EPR Lifetime (Wednesday, 3 November)

paul.downey@bt.com

• RE: Agenda: WS-A telcon 2004-11-29 (Monday, 29 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (implementation model) (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Issue 0001: Use cases for Reference Properties? (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: Issue 0001: Use cases for Reference Properties? (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax [i032] (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax [i032] (Monday, 15 November)
• RE: New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax [i032] (Friday, 12 November)
• RE: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)
• i009 Cardinality of properties and their values (Friday, 12 November)
• RE: i029 Disallowing Faults (Friday, 12 November)
• schema / component model for addressing structures? (Wednesday, 10 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Monday, 8 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Monday, 8 November)
• foo wsa:action (was WS-Addr issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: NEW ISSUE (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)

Rich Salz

• Re: Agenda: WS-A telcon 2004-11-29 (Monday, 29 November)
• RE: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Thursday, 25 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Thursday, 25 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Thursday, 25 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: Composibility problems with refps (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: Composibility problems with refps (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: ACTION: Rich to begin work on schema (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: Composibility problems with refps (Tuesday, 23 November)
• NEW ISSUE: Replace QName's with anyURI (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: Composibility problems with refps (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax [i032] (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax [i032] (Monday, 22 November)
• WD CHANGE: Mention schema, XML 1.0 decisions (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Sunday, 21 November)
• ACTION: Rich to begin work on schema (Friday, 19 November)
• RE: i034: computing default Action value for WSDL 2.0 (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: i034: computing default Action value for WSDL 2.0 (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: Issue 019: WSDL Version Neutrality (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax [i032] (Saturday, 13 November)
• RE: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Saturday, 13 November)
• Re: New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax [i032] (Saturday, 13 November)
• Re: New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax [i032] (Friday, 12 November)
• RE: Why FaultTo? (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: schema / component model for addressing structures? (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Sunday, 7 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Sunday, 7 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Sunday, 7 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Friday, 5 November)
• New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Wednesday, 3 November)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

• Re: New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax [i032] (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax [i032] (Saturday, 13 November)
• Re: New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax [i032] (Saturday, 13 November)
• Re: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: i029 Disallowing Faults (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Why FaultTo? (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Action item: embedded policy requirements/use case (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Wednesday, 3 November)

Savas Parastatidis

• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Sunday, 21 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Saturday, 13 November)
• RE: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)
• RE: Issue 019: WSDL Version Neutrality (Wednesday, 10 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Sunday, 7 November)
• RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)

Srinivas, Davanum M

• RE: NEW ISSUE: Marking RefProps/RefParams using attributes (Tuesday, 30 November)
• NEW ISSUE: Marking RefProps/RefParams using attributes (Tuesday, 30 November)
• RE: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Thursday, 25 November)
• RE: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Thursday, 25 November)
• RE: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Thursday, 25 November)
• RE: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Thursday, 25 November)
• RE: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Thursday, 25 November)
• RE: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Thursday, 25 November)
• RE: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Thursday, 25 November)
• RE: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Sunday, 21 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Saturday, 13 November)
• RE: Issue #1: Proposed text and resolution (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: EPRs and URIs prezo at F2F (Thursday, 4 November)

Steve Graham

• Re: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) (Monday, 29 November)

Steve Maine

• Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Thursday, 18 November)

Tom Rutt

• Re: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Scope of message addressing properties (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: Composibility problems with refps (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: i026: Supporting Multiple Ports in EPRs: Initial proposal (Monday, 15 November)
• Re: ISSUE 8 : "Clarity and Safety" (Monday, 15 November)
• Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (Monday, 15 November)
• Re: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: ISSUE 8 : "Clarity and Safety" (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: IOR Questions (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: WS-Addr issues (Friday, 5 November)

Vambenepe, William N

• RE: Composibility problems with refps (Tuesday, 23 November)

Vinoski, Stephen

• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?) (Tuesday, 23 November)
• i026: Supporting Multiple Ports in EPRs: Initial proposal (Saturday, 13 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Tuesday, 9 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Monday, 8 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Monday, 8 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Sunday, 7 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Sunday, 7 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Sunday, 7 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Sunday, 7 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Sunday, 7 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Saturday, 6 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Saturday, 6 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Thursday, 4 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Wednesday, 3 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Wednesday, 3 November)
• RE: WS-Addr issues (Wednesday, 3 November)

Yalcinalp, Umit

• RE: Issue 019: WSDL Version Neutrality (Tuesday, 9 November)
• RE: Issue 019: WSDL Version Neutrality (Tuesday, 9 November)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 November 2004 22:43:19 UTC