- From: Mark Little <mark.little@arjuna.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 08:27:32 +0000
- To: Jeff Mischkinsky <jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>, "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Agreed. I thought something in scope was open for *open* discussion, including the possibility of modification and/or removal. If there are things in the specification that we aren't allowed to talk about and/or change then can the proposers of the charter write them down so we can all see them now? Mark. On 6 Nov 2004, at 04:07, Jeff Mischkinsky wrote: > > > On Nov 05, 2004, at 9:27 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > >> >> Jim, >> >> Communicating the action is explicitly in-scope, as per our charter >> <http://www.w3.org/2004/09/wsa-charter>. > > Just because it is in scope doesn't mean we HAVE to do it. > jeff >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> On Nov 5, 2004, at 10:09 AM, Jim Webber wrote: >> >>> >>> Paul >>> >>> [should have replied to all, appologies] >>> >>>> my electricity bill is sent to "accounts department", "Southern >>>> Gas*, >>>> London" accounts department" being the action in this case. >>> >>> Ok - that's a very enlightened view of an action. >>> >>>> endpoints are about /routing/ and action is about /dispatching/ i >>>> don't see how the ws-addressing spec could specify that dispatch >>>> contents must be, say a noun rather than a verb. >>> >>> Endpoints are addressable, and actions are something to do >>> with some activity beyond the enpdoint. Therefore I fail to >>> see how ws-addressing should busy itself worring about >>> dispatching which to my mind is out of scope. >> >> >> -- >> Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist >> Office of the CTO BEA Systems >> >> >> > -- > Jeff Mischkinsky jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com > Director, Web Services Standards +1(650)506-1975 > Consulting Member Technical Staff 500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 4OP9 > Oracle Corporation Redwood Shores, CA 94065 > >
Received on Saturday, 6 November 2004 08:28:46 UTC