- From: Jeff Mischkinsky <jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 20:07:04 -0800
- To: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
- Cc: "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
On Nov 05, 2004, at 9:27 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
> Jim,
>
> Communicating the action is explicitly in-scope, as per our charter
> <http://www.w3.org/2004/09/wsa-charter>.
Just because it is in scope doesn't mean we HAVE to do it.
jeff
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> On Nov 5, 2004, at 10:09 AM, Jim Webber wrote:
>
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> [should have replied to all, appologies]
>>
>>> my electricity bill is sent to "accounts department", "Southern Gas*,
>>> London" accounts department" being the action in this case.
>>
>> Ok - that's a very enlightened view of an action.
>>
>>> endpoints are about /routing/ and action is about /dispatching/ i
>>> don't see how the ws-addressing spec could specify that dispatch
>>> contents must be, say a noun rather than a verb.
>>
>> Endpoints are addressable, and actions are something to do
>> with some activity beyond the enpdoint. Therefore I fail to
>> see how ws-addressing should busy itself worring about
>> dispatching which to my mind is out of scope.
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist
> Office of the CTO BEA Systems
>
>
>
--
Jeff Mischkinsky jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com
Director, Web Services Standards +1(650)506-1975
Consulting Member Technical Staff 500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 4OP9
Oracle Corporation Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Received on Saturday, 6 November 2004 04:07:59 UTC