- From: Mark Little <mark.little@arjuna.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:32:34 -0000
- To: "John Fuller" <jfuller@wernervas.com>, "Christopher B Ferris" <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
+1 ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Fuller" <jfuller@wernervas.com> To: "Christopher B Ferris" <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> Cc: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>; <public-ws-addressing@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 4:32 PM Subject: Re: Sample SOAP message on the wire with Reference Properties and Parameters (without a wrapper!) > > As stateful sessions go, wouldn't something like WS-Context be more > appropriate? > > On Nov 24, 2004, at 10:01 AM, Christopher B Ferris wrote: > > > > > The ref props/params *can* be used to provide additional information > > that > > the service provider will use > > as it sees fit. One such purpose that has been used by WS-RF has been > > to > > pass keys/identifiers to > > resources (implied resource pattern) as ref props, but that is not the > > only use of ref props/params. > > In the context of the implied resource pattern, the ref props > > serialized > > as SOAP headers can be > > considered the equivalent of cookies used to associate a stateful > > session, > > like a shopping cart service > > might do. > > > > As an example that is often used, a service might have three levels of > > service; silver, gold and platinum. > > Each level of service might have a different policy that applies. > > Hence, I > > would use the ref props to > > include a <myservice:MembershipLevel> element with the possible values > > Silver, Gold, or Platinum. > > Is that identity? Nope. > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 2004 16:35:02 UTC