Re: Issue numbers

Nah, just for future reference.

Cheers,


On Nov 15, 2004, at 11:33 AM, Glen Daniels wrote:

>
> Oops, sorry - I just followed the convention I was seeing for issue
> 0001.  Should I resend with amended subject lines?
>
> --Glen
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: member-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
>> [mailto:member-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
>> Mark Nottingham
>> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 2:15 PM
>> To: member-ws-addressing@w3.org
>> Subject: Nit: Issue numbers
>>
>>
>> Either some people are being pessimistic (i.e., they think we'll have
>> more than 1000 issues), or are misstating issue numbers.
>>
>> E.g.,
>> i001  <-- CORRECT
>> i0001  <-- INCORRECT
>>
>> The latter form makes it harder to find relevant e-mails.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
>> Office of the CTO   BEA Systems
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

--
Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
Office of the CTO   BEA Systems

Received on Monday, 15 November 2004 19:49:19 UTC