- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 20:17:58 -0500 (EST)
- To: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- cc: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
> As you pointed out, this is only a migration argument.
Yeah, but phrasing it that way undercuts the importance of making the
right decision. I don't think we should bet our success on the
adoption of WSDL 2.0 -- I mean XML 1.1/XML1.0 is "just" a migration
issue, too, and we all but ruled that out of scope.
> Maybe if others agree with me, and if we also want to ease migration,
> we should actually change the algorithm for 1.1 to match 2.0's.
I'm not sure what you mean by this (please explain), but the phrasing
sets of alarm bells. We *cannot* break the current deployed base,
of WSDL 1.0 and how it's used, so I assume you don't mean that.
/r$
--
Rich Salz Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2004 01:17:59 UTC