- From: Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 21:36:53 -0500
- To: "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>
- Cc: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>, "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>, "Marc Hadley" <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>, "Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>, public-ws-addressing@w3.org, public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org, "Savas Parastatidis" <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>
Note that the use of reference properties within an epr is already
optional: epr issuers are not required to use them. The only requirement is
for consumers of the epr to echo them back as SOAP headers.
Paco
"Jim Webber"
<Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>, "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>,
.uk> Francisco Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, "Marc Hadley" <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
Sent by: cc: "Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>,
public-ws-addressing-req <public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org>, "Savas Parastatidis"
uest@w3.org <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: WS-Addr issues
11/04/2004 06:02 PM
> - Jim wanting to get rid of ref props/params and Action (and
> by extension I'm wondering if messageid and relatesTo should
> be removed IHO),
Nope. I'd be happy with the removal of refprop/param and optional
action. Nothing else has impacted negatively in my work.
However I understand the need for expediency. If refprop/param remain
then as long as their use is optional I won't hang myself on them. Ditto
for action - I'll just use a generic "urn:process:message" action.
Jim
--
http://jim.webber.name
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 02:37:28 UTC