- From: Mark Little <mark.little@arjuna.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:12:06 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
- Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
I'd prefer to have this as a separate issue. If we decided to drop wsa:Action (which I doubt), then i017 is superfluous. If we decided to keep it in some form, then it's not. Mark. On 5 Nov 2004, at 13:31, Mark Nottingham wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > Can we consider this as part of i017, or is it really separate? > >> i017 Purpose of the Action property >> Why is it neccessary to be able to specify a non-default Action? Why >> are non-unique Action headers allowed? What is the relationship >> between the action value and the operation name? > > (Also, please include a description of the issue along with "NEW > ISSUE"; otherwise, we'll just have a monster "NEW ISSUE" thread. :) > > Cheers, > > > On Nov 5, 2004, at 3:41 AM, Mark Little wrote: > >> Not exactly sure of the wording you'd require, but here goes: >> >> I'd like to propose raising a new issue on the utility of wsa:Action >> and its presence in a specification about addressing. >> >> Mark. >> >> >> ---- >> Mark Little, >> Chief Architect, >> Arjuna Technologies Ltd. >> >> www.arjuna.com >> >> > > -- > Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist > Office of the CTO BEA Systems > >
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 16:15:19 UTC