- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:27:06 -0000
- To: <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Jim wrote: > services exist independent of whether or not there is any > WSDL description of them (and in some cases in spite of!). +1, but as i'm sure you realise that's not the opinion of some here who (AIUI) want an EPR to unambiguously point back to a WSDL description. > Actually while I'm on the subject: why does WSDL keep cropping up > in this WG? Addresses and interfaces are chalk and cheese. well, we are chartered to deliver WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 bindings .. > The sexy bit of WS-Addressing is that it makes SOAP transport > neutral (yay!). yay! let's reinvent the whole 7 layer model in XML in layer 7 :-| Paul
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 2004 09:26:27 UTC