RE: Issue 019: WSDL Version Neutrality

• From: Savas Parastatidis <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>
• Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 00:05:07 -0000
• To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <37E80E80B681A24B8F768D607373CA800172CC5E@largo.campus.ncl.ac.uk>

<snip/> 

>   This leaves us with an interesting issue: if there is a WSDL 1.1 and
>   WSDL 2.0 description available, which is the implicit value of the
>   action property? If in a year's time we release WSDL 2.1, what
>   happens? I believe that there is an implicit value of the action URI
>   recognized by the recipient of the addressing information for the
>   description of the service made in each version of WSDL. Those are
>   equivalent for the purpose of our specification.

<savas-attempting-to-make-a-joke>

The above would not be an issue if wsa:action didn't exist, right? :-)))

</savas-attempting-to-make-a-joke>


<snip/>


.savas.


PS: Apologies to the WG... I couldn't resist :-)

Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2004 00:06:20 UTC