RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers from Martin Gudgin on 2004-11-17 (public-ws-addressing@w3.org from November 2004)

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:00:51 -0800
To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>, "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DD35CC66F54D8248B6E04232892B633804008F49@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
> David Orchard
> Sent: 17 November 2004 16:39
> To: David Booth; public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> Subject: RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers
> 
<SNIP/>
> 3. A URI could be separated into different sections, but 
> that's not the
> issue.  The issue is that applications may want identifier information
> that is protocol independent or in a separate identifier space.  This
> enables loose coupling, particularly separation of concerns.  
> By having
> the URI and Refs separate, then completely orthogonal 
> software can work
> on each piece. 

Big +1

Gudge

Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2004 19:01:27 UTC