- From: Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:28:06 -0500
- To: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@sun.com>
- CC: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
I have one question: If the replyTo can be used for either 1 ) a single MEP associated with the message containing the replyTo; or 2) a future mep instance, (e.g., callback) , not associated with the message containing the reply To; or 3) both uses 1 and 2 How does the receiver determin which of the three uses is implied by the sender? Tom Rutt Marc Hadley wrote: > > Title: Scope of message addressing properties > > Description: What is the expected scope of each message addressing > property. E.g. Does the presence of a wsa:ReplyTo in the response > message of a request-response MEP indicate that future messages in the > same 'logical' conversation should be sent to the EPR in the ReplyTo. > > Justification: During discussion of issue 28[1] it emerged that there > were different views on the scope of message addressing properties. > Some WG members (myself included) assumed that message addressing > properties were scoped to a particular instance of an MEP while others > believe that their impact can extend beyond that scope. The > specification doesn't appear to support any one view. > > Target: Core > > Proposal: This issue requires some discussion by the WG prior to > proposing a resolution > > Marc. > > [1] See thread starting at: > http://www.w3.org/mid/9D1B57A0-3349-11D9-AEEE-000A95BC8D92@Sun.COM > --- > Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com> > Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems. > > -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2004 20:31:13 UTC