RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers

The problem was that my complaint was targetted at the submission, but it was too late to do anything about that once the submission was accepted. I'd expect that a fresh WG draft would be another matter altogether.

-----Original Message-----
From:  David Orchard
Date:  04-11-13 16:48
To:  Mark Baker, public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Subj:  RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers

I thought you'd already asked the TAG to look at this and the TAG
decided not to and you rescinded your request?  Or do you think that a
WG requesting examination of this issue will be treated differently?

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-addressing-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mark Baker
> Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 5:45 AM
> To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> Subject: Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers
> 
> 
> Given the aggressive publication schedule, combined with the
> inevitability of this issue finding itself in front of the TAG, as
well
> as the delays implicit with the impending holiday season, I'd suggest
> that it would be prudent for the WG to request TAG input ASAP.  That
is,
> of course, assuming that there's concensus to adopt Dave's proposal,
and
> not, say, my alternative proposal of defining an epr URI scheme and
> mapping.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Mark.

Received on Sunday, 14 November 2004 13:11:34 UTC